Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Cougars In Heat

Cougars In Heat (0)

Active
82
james4096 (126) 01-09-10  05:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The women are hot and look like cougars, and the scenes are hot
- No DRM or download limit
- HD videos look very good
- Download manager friendly. Resumes downloads, multiple connections, queue and download later works
- Zip downloads for the photos. And separate links for soft and hard photos
Cons: - Some of the navigation links don't seem to work. If you click on "models" sometimes nothing happens.
- Also some of the video files in ipod format are missing.
- No actual model pages.
- Ads, including Adult friend Finder, in the member's area
- A little too expensive for a site with no network access
- Only one update a week, and it's late at times
Bottom Line: This is a good one if you like hardcore MILF scenes with pornstars. These are traditional video style scenes with a little scenario and everything, not reality gonzo. These are well known pornstars and they seem to look the part of cougars. I'd say they're all between 35-50, I don't know Nina Hartley is probably the oldest one they have. It's all white women with the exception of one scene and it's exclusively B/G. Most of the content seems exclusive, but I have definitely seen at least one of the scenes elsewhere. There were 163 scenes at the time of this review and updates come once a week, occasionally more. The update schedule is irregular, but they do come.

Four types of files are offered for the video downloads, HD mp4, standard rez mp4 & wmv, and an Ipod size mp4. The wmv's are just average, and they do get blocky at times. Go for the HD mp4s they appear to be 1280x720. There are full scene downloads or split into 10 clips. Like I mentioned in the cons, the ipod format is missing sometimes. Also you'll find 3 qualities of streaming flash.

The top quality still photos are 1077x1616, and screen caps are 960x540. Could be better could be worse. One thing that was strange was that they offer "high quality" photos and "high resolution" photos. The "high resolution" are the better of the two. Pretty dumb naming system if you ask me. One thing I like about the way they did photos was that they have separated hardcore and softcore photos. I usually go for the softcore photos because I have video for hardcore. There are separate zips of hard, soft and screencaps.

I really enjoyed this site, I thought the content was good and I would recommend it. I would add 10 points to the score if the site was either cheaper, or was part of a network. If you are wondering the amount of videos they had worth $30, I say yes. However, Naughty America has several similar sites and over a dozen other niches and I usually only pay $10 for that. My suggestions for improvement would be to lower the price and spice things up a bit. Do an occasional threesome or use a model of a different ethnicity.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

mbaya (356) I have had bad experiences with sites that advertised adult friend finder. Did you get any viruses or other kinds of malware?
01-11-10  11:47am

Reply To Message

2

james4096 (126) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

Oh god. I sure hope not. I don't think so.

Adblocker for firefox usually filters most AFF shit out based on my previous experiences but I did have to add some new rules.

01-12-10  02:21am

Reply To Message

3

alexmedia (22) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

I've never heard that AFF uses viruses, may be some anti-virus programs fail on alert on < iframe > or something.
01-17-10  08:53am

Reply To Message

4

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #3 - alexmedia :

What I got was iframead_32_holder(1). It also said HTML IFRAME HT. Check out http://www.bestsecuritytips.com/news+article.storyid+419.htm You will see they got fined by the FTC for doing this.
01-17-10  10:58pm

Reply To Message

5

alexmedia (22) REPLY TO #4 - mbaya :

Thx for information.
01-18-10  01:41am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.