Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Breath Takers

Breath Takers (0)

Active
87
anyonebutme (14) 01-05-10  12:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -professional & creative photography work
-mix of both European and American girls
-4000px images in zip file downloads (1000px size also available)
-new videos in 8mbps 720p format
-pleasing site design and organization
-every photoset & video cover image is visible from the preview pages
Cons: -infrequent updates, usually two per week, and not on a consistent schedule
-some navigational issues
-videos are on the short side
Bottom Line: This is a soft softcore photography site, not all photosets offer full nudity, and rarely are there close ups of the girl's naughty bits. The content is erotic posing, do not expect to see girls playing with themselves or sticking their asses in our faces. A different type of erotism is what they intend, and they actually achieve it rather well.

To note, they are a bit heavy on photoshop softening, though at least they do it in a way that preserves the depth of the girls' bodies in the images - as opposed to other photoshopped sites which often leaves the girl looking flat head to toe. Check the previews to get a sense of what to expect.

The update schedule is their biggest issue, they certainly are not on par with other sites in their genre. However many other photography sites with daily updates I'm often hard pressed to find even a half-dozen truly exceptional new sets in the month, where at breath-takers nearly every update I found exciting and worth the wait - as well as the thrill of browsing through the model pages of past updates.

A couple navigational inconveniences lurk in the site. From the "updates" page to get to the zip download is not intuitive, and some of the site pages contain an outdated navigational link back to the member home page. Though as with all sites, content is the most important aspect, and the navigation issues are minor at their worst.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Denner (233) Good to have a review of this site (none at TBP so far).
Fine review, justme - btw.
I dig posing-material, but one question:
Though it's primarily a photosite, they got videos, too - judging from the preview it looks like those videos are foremost done of photoshoots.
Is that it?

01-05-10  06:14am

Reply To Message

2

anyonebutme (14) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Some are little clip of the photoshoot, while others are dedicated sexy teasing clips. The videos are not really the type to collect/save and rewatch, though, do not be expecting that. Nice to watch their girls in action, but photography is the main draw to the site.
01-05-10  04:27pm

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) Good review. Gives overall site description. I also like the preview area of the site, which gives a good intro to the site itself. I'm into softcore pix, but the site seems too small to be worth even a 1-month membership. But that's just my personal taste, based on your review and what I see from the site preview.
01-05-10  04:36pm

Reply To Message

4

anyonebutme (14) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

That's how I also felt, before joining.

I don't know what type of porn viewer you are, I read many comments from guys around here who seek out to do site rips immediately upon joining, and complain if they have the full site downloaded before the month is up.

I also frequently chat with someone on another board who watches about two hours of new porn videos every single day.

I take a much more relaxed approach to porn consuming, and found this site to my liking, even if it's just a mere 350+ photosets for $25.

To each their own =)

01-05-10  05:45pm

Reply To Message

5

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #4 - anyonebutme :

To each their own, which means personal tastes differ, I think.
My own preferences are softcore over hardcore, pix over vids.
But I will look at hardcore, and at vids, hoping to find something I like.
It's just that there's more softcore that appeals to me than hardcore.
Also, I think it's easier to make good photos than to make good videos, for a lot of different reasons, and it's easier (takes less effort) to search through pix than to search through vids (less time-consuming, and less expensive). And vids take up much more room on the hard drive than pix.

The important factors of a site to me are quality and quantity and price. I don't require a huge amount of material if the material is highly appealing. But based on the short preview of the site, and your review, this site appears to have little material that is extremely appealing to me, so I will give it a pass (a do-not-join). Someone else might find the models or photos or videos extremely attractive, but there are other sites that I think offer more value for the price (I'm not saying the site has no value, just that it doesn't appear to offer high value to me.).

Or to quote you, in a simple summary of what I've said: "To each their own =)"

01-05-10  06:12pm

Reply To Message

6

anyonebutme (14) REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :

All that is fine. For me it's not often but once in a while I come across a porn product that really lets my imagination run wild while watching it, and this is when porn becomes so much more than just eye candy. For me breath-takers does it, where other sites that have a much greater release to dollar ratio, just don't match the same feeling.
01-08-10  01:44am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.