Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit All Over 30

All Over 30 (1)

Auxilia (4) 01-02-10  12:00pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)

No more daft outfits

I agree with Cap'n, above. Ill fitting 'French Maid' outfits HAVE HAD THEIR DAY!

My favourite content on this site were in no particular order:

9 to 5 ladies (office and sports wear)
elegant ladies (evening wear)
a category which used 'homely' setting and casual everyday - can't remember what it was called

The lacey ladies category was I thought a bit daft. I also thought their M/F and much of their F/F material was a bit poor.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (10)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Capn (28) I appreciate the support.

Their concept is fine. It is just to me I feel the webamsters & some of their photgraphers are stuck in the teenage porn mindset.

Cap'n :0/

01-02-10  12:53pm

Reply To Message

2

RagingBuddhist (63) I'm with you on the French maid outfits, although it's not quite as bad as angel wings. If I ever see a woman on this site with angel wings, I'll be absolutely done with it!

I think you meant "homey", although some of the women ARE a bit on the homely side. ; - ) And I believe the category name you're looking for is what they just call Mature Women - a kind of a generic catch-all for shoots that didn't fit the other niches/fetishes.

01-02-10  12:56pm

Reply To Message

3

mr smut (42) REPLY TO #2 - RagingBuddhist :

It's Mature Housewives or Furry Housewives (recent example is Erica) if lots of pubes can be seen to be more precise ;-) I've just taken another look at Andie's latest Elegant Ladies update that's more like it! I was happy to see Beata do some jogging. India F with glasses is a stunning 9 to 5 lady.

All in all I'm quite happy and have signed for another 3 months yesterday :-)

But I agree that angel wings are a no-go ... this simply sucks!

Cheers,
Smut

01-02-10  11:00pm

Reply To Message

4

messmer (137) I'd be interested to know what you found "daft" in the lacy ladies category? I always took them to task for not being lacy enough. Is that what you mean? Another question: are the ladies equipped with a bit more underwear during their shoots these days? I found that most wore the absolute minimum and could switch from business suit to stark naked in five pictures. One of the photographers took our complaints to heart and promised to go undies shopping for more exciting picture sets for those of us who like a more gradual strip rather than see the models come to the set commando style. :-) See my comment a bit farther down.
01-04-10  03:15pm

Reply To Message

5

messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - RagingBuddhist :

"I'm with you on the French maid outfits, although it's not quite as bad as angel wings. If I ever see a woman on this site with angel wings, I'll be absolutely done with it!"


Couldn't be worse than those phony nurses' outfits made of vinyl. :-)
I think I hate all uniforms. School girl outfits (usually worn by mature women) are another pet peeve.

01-04-10  03:28pm

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) Oops, just looked up who you might be and came across your review of St. Mackenzies. Quite obviously one of us likes school girl outfits. No offense was intended. :-)
01-04-10  03:34pm

Reply To Message

7

Auxilia (4) REPLY TO #6 - messmer :

Dude! None taken at all!

I guess what I was trying to say (badly) was that I like costumes PROVIDED they are done well! St Mackenzie's does it VERY well IMHO, Fets.com used to long ago. Any costume genre done on the cheap looks exactly like that - cheap!

01-05-10  11:10am

Reply To Message

8

messmer (137) REPLY TO #7 - Auxilia :

I'm glad you didn't take offense. Still wondering what you meant by the lacy section being daft? This happens to be my favorite section and my complaint always was that any model wearing underwear at all was being put into that niche, watering it down considerably. :-) I would honestly like your opinion.
01-05-10  11:17am

Reply To Message

9

Auxilia (4) REPLY TO #8 - messmer :

Well some of the lacy stuff was OK, but some of the apparel looked a little, well cheap. I just prefer my ladies to start off wearing more!
01-05-10  11:39am

Reply To Message

10

messmer (137) REPLY TO #9 - Auxilia :

Okay, we're on the same wave length on that subject! :-)
01-05-10  04:15pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.