Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Girls In Nature.org

Girls In Nature.org (0)

Active
72
Drooler (218) 11-11-09  02:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +beautiful models (mostly); Ukrainian, mostly if not all
+impressive photography
+quite a lot of the shooting is done indoors, regardless of the site name
+exclusive content
+images at over 4000 px (except for April 2005 and before: 3000 px)
+allows use of DownloadThemAll
+OK price if you view it as an “archive” site
+Videos are avi, 1280 x 720, softcore posing, music for the sound track
Cons: -pages of gallery thumbs can be very slow at loading sometimes
-a total of only 185 galleries; the site goes back to January, 2004, so clearly “daily updates” are not part of the idea here
-no zips
-images only available in one size (HUGE)
-navigation is a bit of learning experience and is somewhat cumbersome
-few updates per month (sometimes only one; sometimes NONE)
-some models have different names than at other sites
-galleries in 2007 and before sometimes do not include the model’s name
-too many girl/girl sets
-a few of the models are not very appealing
-only 32 videos
Bottom Line: Photographer: If you’re a MetArt fan, you’ve probably noticed the name Sergey Goncharov amongst the photographers. Girls in Nature is his own site of exclusive softcore photography.

Navigation: After you log in for the first time (and “Style 1” works fine), the home page just lists, with thumbs, several of the most recent galleries on a very long page. It’s better to go the “collections,” which are organized by year. For a given year, you’re given a list for each month on separate page. You can start from the top of that list and then click, page by page, through the thumbs of each gallery for that month. I’ve found that it’s useful to open the first gallery for a month in a separate window so it’s easy to return to the list for the month when it’s time to go to the next month.

Models: Several of the models have also appeared at other sites, but as is especially typical with the ones from "out east" there, they go by different names on different sites. Here’s a list of some of them as they are named at Girls in Nature: Anna or sometimes Anya (Atena A at MetArt; Paulina at FemJoy); Irisha (Katrin B at MetArt); Karina (Karina J at MetArt); Meris (Sofi A atMetArt); Suri D (Monyka at FemJoy).

I feel satisfied enough with the site content, but it was a chore with the navigation, the need to use a download manager, and the server response, which actually got so bad that I had to quit a couple of times and return later. All such things considered, it’s a “might recommend.”

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) The navigation for the preview section (and probably the member area of the site) seems extremely cumbersome. The site really needs a programmer to make the site easier to use, to show what models are available, and their photosets and videos. A simple site design like Met-art or MPL Studios would be a big improvement.

But the $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) seems attractive. I've been seeing more monthly memberships in the $15-20 range lately, maybe as a result of the recession.

The $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) is what is listed at PU/TBP. When I go to the site itself, using the PU/TBP link, the monthly price (recurring) I see listed is $16.95.

11-11-09  05:38pm

Reply To Message

2

TheRizzo (23) Hey Drooler, thanks for bringing this site to my attention. I love outdoor sets and this site speaks to me. Going to take the plunge next week and check it out.
11-12-09  11:57pm

Reply To Message

3

Svitanok (0) Nice Review but I must say that the Site have change now complete.
They have move to another Server and have a complete new Site Design.
The Navigation is now excellent. All Pictures now in different resolutions. All Girls are exclusive Models of Sergej Goncharov
and they are all Ukrainian.
Of course you see some of them on another sites but the Copyright
is allways by Sergej and the pictures on "Girls in Nature" are not to
find on the other sites.The content is exclusive for "Girls in Nature".
You wrote that there are only 32 Videos. Thats right but Sergej is
a photografer and so it is to understand that he have him focus on
Pictures and not on videos.
Also I like to say that they have a very good,fast and absolut friendly support.

12-04-09  01:41am

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #3 - Svitanok :

I just noticed that the site has a new design, but my login expired, prematurely at that, so I can't enter to view the new version of the site and thereby update the review.

About the number of videos, that's information for readers to know. Frankly, I'm not very interested in softcore videos myself, but had I not mentioned how many and other info, it would have been an omission on my part. I was writing a review, yes?

I joined the site for the photos only.

Good luck with the new version!

12-04-09  02:40am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.