Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes (1)

mbaya (364) 09-23-09  06:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-No DRM or any download limits.
-Works with download managers. I downloaded 88 videos, 12.8 GB in an hour and a half without a single problem.
-Nearly all models top notch attractive.
-Huge website. See TBP for details.
-Beautiful HD quality videos, 1280x720 over 3000 kbps.
Cons: -Others have commented that the photo sets are not numbered. The videos are numbered, but don't have the models name. If you don't rename each video, you would have no idea who the model is. The site itself has names for the videos such as slinky or bubbles. Why not some name that helps?
-As several others have commented, the videos are more like art than erotic. Not recommended.
-Far too many outdoor videos. This makes most of them have backlighting, uneven lighting or are simply shot from too far away.
Bottom Line: I have come to appreciate videos that are HD. After recently joining sites of lesser video quality and being disappointed, I came to feel that without HD I don't want to join. The HD videos here are of stunning quality.

But is that enough? Apparently not. I made two fundamental mistakes when I joined this site. Both Denner and JD 1961 hit the nail on the head in their comments/reviews. The videos are just boring. Being arty in their style, you get for example, a nude girl rolling around in bed covered by a sheet. Wow. I am truly impressed. No great posing, moving too fast for you to really get into the scenes. They just miss the point of why I want to join a site. Nude women are very sexy, but this site manages to remove the erotic qualities that should be here. I realize it is a matter of taste, but two of the reviewers I trust the most said the same things. I should have just gone by what they said about the site.

The other mistake I made was that this site is just not about videos. If you go to a seafood restaurant, don't order the steak. Don't go to a fast food and expect top notch lobster. Once again, I have not found a site that is about photos to be a place where the videos are of great nudes. I would love to find sites that are erotic videos without masturbation.

To sum up my feelings, don't join for the videos alone. I realize this site is all about opinions, but Maggie, not a 91!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.

  Be the first to reply to mbaya!

  Reply To Review

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.