Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Shemale Yum

Shemale Yum (0)

GCode (101) 09-22-09  05:50pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive Content of mostly North American tranny content involved in posing, masturbation, and hardcore action.
- No DRM protection.
- Updates weekly with 7 new photosets and/or video shoots. These updates occur on one day.
- Photo shoots available in zip format and range in res, from 1280 to 720 or lower.
- Videos range in formats by years with the newest vids only available in WMV. Newest vids are around 720 X 480, ~2000 kbps. Older ones steadily go down in quality ranging from 640 X 480, ~2000 kbps to 360 X 240, ~800 kbps. The older videos range from AVI, Real Media, and WMV formats.
- Extensive amount of content dating back from even 1999, but the majority of the content occurs from 2003 to present.
- A nice ranking system to view favorites of others and yourself. Plus a 'My Portfolio' section to add models you love for easy access.
- Pretty active forum for discussion.
- Comics section that gets updated often.
- Search feature with accurate tags and plenty of them.
Cons: - Obviously, since the library is extensive, the actual visual quality of the older content may be lower. What's in the footage is still good, but not the clarity.
- While the photography is done extremely well with quality photographers, the actual resolution should be higher for a company doing this for this long.
- Updates are done a bit different than other sites, varying between strip teases, masturbation, masturbation with a cum shot, and hardcore action. The only quirk I have personally is the fact that not all solo shoots end in a cum shot or an attempt (obviously some models cannot cum due to hormones). Usually, when a solo scene in shemale content is done, it is a full strip to masturbation with cumshot shoot. Just takes a bit of getting used to.
- The price is a bit high for the content, at $35 for it. However, there is a ticket system that can be used to lower prices for all grooby sites. The info is posted by me in the comments section of this site.
Bottom Line: Shemale Yum has been around for years and clearly prides themselves for shooting an extensive amount of shemale content and models. Boasting over 1,100 models with mostly all of these models doing photo and video shoots, the site has an extremely large collection of content. The site features many models first that have gone on to become the huge superstars of tomorrow but also shoot amateurs or just models who want to do one or two shoots only. All-in-all, expect some of the largest amount of shemale content if you join.

Remember, the vast amount of content does come with a bit of a loss. Meaning, both the picture and video clarity will be going down year by year. Plus, the videos will only be available in clips at about anything pre-2006 which is a lot of content. However, the content within the videos are quite well done. While being a bit unconventional in updating in my opinion, it does create a range of different visuals to observe. The visuals will vary between shoots usually and are mostly well done in terms of professionlism. Overall, the videos are done well but my largest quirk is chitter chatter between the camera man and the model, sexual acts done between the camera man and the model, and a lack of total cumshots per model. Don't get me wrong, most of the models do cum eventually in updates, but having 4-5 different shoots with only one shoot resulting in a cumshot can be a burden for some.

The photography is very well done in terms of lighting, differences of outfits, and locations. While they could be a bit bigger this day and age, I think some photographers are better than others while some of their staff are better videographers. The watermark is done well and non-intrusive while the poses vary from one picture to the other quite well. Overall, they are not extremely repetitious and look quite well.

The structure of the site is well made with plenty of options to help the overall experience. Navigation is easy and there are a bunch of extras to read. Models have some descriptions and updates on what they are doing nowadays, there are blogs, and an active forum. In addition to the forum, there is a live chat program for communication between the photographers and members. Plus, I'd say customer service for grooby is great.

The site is obviously doing more things right than wrong. But, I cannot give a score in the 90's for a few reasons. First, the update scheme. While others may not mind this, I found a large portion of the videos to be downloaded but fast forwarded through. Second, the chitter chatter in older videos. Third, the picture res should get higher. Fourth, why are the videos not at 1280 X 720 or higher yet? However, there are great things within this site. I love that the site does bring back older models and you can see the transition in to beauty. With the extensive amount of content in both the photos and videos added with a huge model list only seen on this site, I'd recommend this site to everyone.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


james4096 (126) Nice review as usual.

And here comes seanchai in 3...2...1

But seriously this was a very fair review. There's nothing to argue about. I do wonder when they are going to start giving 1280x720.

09-22-09  06:22pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) Good review.
I'm curious to know how much content you would say involves trannies with girls. That's the only kind of tranny porn I can watch. The guy and tranny does not appeal to me.

09-22-09  06:28pm

Reply To Message


GCode (101) REPLY TO #1 - james4096 :

lol about the webmaster response. But, I suppose some response is better than none. No matter how stubborn he may be, as you said I believe I was quite fair and I took all the discussions between him and I into account when writing this. Hell, it's even better than the new 2.0 review from TBP. I believe between your review and mine, everyone can get an understanding as to what they get from the site. Thanks for the response and positive feedback, james4096!
09-22-09  08:25pm

Reply To Message


GCode (101) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

Honestly pat362, if there is even one video like this, I missed it. So, that basically means there is little to none of that on this site. Basically, maybe less than 5. This site, while featuring hardcore, is mostly a solo site. When there is a hardcore update, it it usually male/TS content or TS/TS content. The TS on female content is kind of hard to find. It's basically on most TS sites featuring hardcore but in the extreme minority. And out of the sites I've been to that features hardcore, I can't even point you in the direction. However, I do remember some DVD's which I think were called, "females on shemales" which featured this, I think they were up in to dozens about a year ago. I know a site, Shemale Club has quite a bit of hardcore footage, maybe a quick email to customer service could help you out. It's been quite awhile since I've been to that site and my archives of that site are actually somewhere on burned DVD's. Hope any of this helps.
09-22-09  08:31pm

Reply To Message


alexmedia (22) Thank you for review.
09-22-09  08:40pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) REPLY TO #4 - GCode :

Thanks. I would have been surprised if this site was different from most other. I'll take a look at shemale club. I'm picky about my shemal on female action. I prefer if it's Europeans or Americans.
Most of what I've found involves Brazilians or South Americans.

09-23-09  06:29pm

Reply To Message


seanchai (17)
REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

Ooops somewhat of a late response!
Very little hardcore of female with shemale. Most of our hardcore content is male with shemale.

04-23-10  09:44am

Reply To Message


seanchai (17)
REPLY TO #1 - james4096 :

After G-Code reviewed all of our sites and his major point was the image size, we polled all members of the site as well as free forum websites specialising in TS porn. Very very few came back wanting larger. We'll continue to monitor and do another poll in a few months but given the amount of people interested in it, it's not reasonable for us to do at this point.
04-23-10  09:46am

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) REPLY TO #7 - seanchai :

Better late than never. Thanks.
04-23-10  07:25pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.