Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Plumper Pass

Plumper Pass (0)

messmer (137) 09-20-09  11:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 3321 videos,

+ 41581 pictures,

+ 213 models,

+ True to its niche,

+ Picture sets come zipped,

+ List of Models has them listed with picture.

+ Something for every taste when it comes to BBWs.
Cons: - Claims to be a network of five sites but should be treated as one.

- Videos are in wmv. format for best quality at 640x480 with bitrates ranging from an unorthodox 984 to 1508! Not up to 2009 standards but not bad. Just not crisp enough to deserve a plus.

- The same strange figures are found in connection with their pictures. Latest sets I downloaded had 667x1000 pixels for Portrait and 1500x1000 pixels for Landscape format in the same set. Again not up to par when compared to other sites.

- Very intrusive watermark on videos and pictures, it draws the eye to the logo rather than to the video itself.

- Streaming stops and buffers every few seconds.

- Daily updates are promised but that basically means that each of the five sites is updated once a week and in the short time I've been with the site I've only seen one update in three days.

- Site will be quickly exhausted by the average user (see below).

- Site support was non-responsive in connection with a question I had.
Bottom Line: I must confess that I've developed a liking for BBWs and found some of the videos I downloaded quite appealing, yet at the same time, I have the feeling that I shall be done with this site shortly because they don't have enough contents when it comes to the various body types within the site. BBW is such a large (no pun intended) category and not every BBW video will appeal to every BBW lover.

Those who like "normal (as compared to runway model thin) to slightly plump" will find what they are looking for, those who like "regular BBWs" will find what they are looking for, and those whose taste goes for the "obese to really obese" will find what THEY are looking for, but the site simply does not contain enough material to keep everyone happy for longer than two weeks tops.

Speed, btw, was quite good (1.7 - 1.8 MB/s) with DownloadThemAll through Firefox but I was only allowed two downloads at a time with that download manager and couldn't go anywhere until one of the downloads was complete. Download by ordinary means weighed in at around 450 KB/s.

It is not a bad site by any means and will appeal to lovers of plump women. Not every model will be to everyone's taste, some are prettier than others, some are plumper than some Porn Users' tastes might tolerate, but it is a change from the usual fare, and even with the limited contents that appealed to me I don't think I was cheated in any way by taking out a month's subscription.

An afterthought: The site also refers to 665 scenes, I left this out of the statistics because I find it confusing. They do not have DVDs and scenes usually refer to a part of a DVD, so I put down the 3321 videos they list and let it go at that. Maybe someone can enlighten me on this!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


RagingBuddhist (65) Hey! What are you doing downloading BBW flicks? It's not your...

I mean, great review! Given your thread on the forum, I found myself looking at this site and you just saved me $25. I might've been able to deal with the limited content and the so-so resolution, but obtrusive logos, hit or miss updates and ignored emails just don't cut it with me.

As far as the connections thing goes, are you sure it's the site and not a Firefox limit? Might be worth trying this:
- Type "about:config" (without quotes) in the address window and hit Enter
- In the filter window, type "network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server" (also without quotes)
- Double click on the line that's left and raise the number.
- Click OK and restart Firefox.

That might do the trick.

09-20-09  05:47pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :

Thanks, RB. Just tried your suggestion with fear and trembling and was left with two lines basically saying the same thing except that the first was in "bold". That one said 6 at the end, the one underneath had a 0. So I left things alone for now unless you can guide me a bit more. :-)

P.S. Expect to find me in other previously uncharted waters as I go along. Much of the main stream is really starting to bore me. :-)

09-20-09  06:24pm

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

You must be using a newer version of FF. When I do the above, I only get one line, so I have no idea what the other one is. The one with the 6 has to be the same as what I'm looking at - you need some number of connections allowed, so I would try changing the one that one to an 8 or even 10 and see if you get more connections at the site. There's no need to be nervous about any configs you do because you can always simply change it back to what it was. If you're worried about forgetting what you changed, just open Notepad and paste the line you put in the filter and the default number and save it.
09-20-09  06:39pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #3 - RagingBuddhist :

Just went to VideoBox to check how many connections I could make there and am downloading four scenes at the same time, RB, so most likely the maximum of two downloads at a time with a download manager must be a site policy. But I will try your suggestion. It's not of major importance to me how many simaltaneous downloads I can do when it comes to this site because I'll have all I want soon enough but it would be helpful at other sites to have more connections.
09-20-09  07:04pm

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #4 - messmer :

Yeah... I forget what site made me look for that tweak, but it's one of those things that's nice to keep in mind.

Thanks again for saving me a few dollars with the review - I've been on a bad streak of cliunker sites and don't need to hit another one any time soon : - /

09-20-09  07:23pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - RagingBuddhist :

Yes, we've all had those experiences with "clunkers" and it will keep happening because the good sites have been mined out by most of us and if we are tempted to re-subscribe to them we are dependent on the daily updates because we have all the good stuff from the past on our hard drives already.

And so we keep straying into unfamiliar territory where we might find the occasional gold nugget but sadly most of the time we will find fool's gold instead! :-)

09-21-09  08:32am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.