Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Dream Kelly

Dream Kelly (0)

dracken (246) 09-18-09  05:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (63), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - About 190 videos available as WMV (320x 240) or quicktime. A lot of the more recent scenes also available in HD (1200x 720).Very fast download speeds.

- Around 270 photo galleries with more or less 400 images each (1024px × 682px). No zipped files though.

- Good looking model, with a wonderful smile. She also has a bunch of different hairstyles and dresses up a lot. However, her back kinda put me off (her spine is very pronounced and looks kinda reptile like in some videos... only a few though)

- A decent variation of dildo, vibrator, strip and some photoshoot videos. But no sex scenes and no anal that I could find.

- Access to a whole network of 7 other solo girls and around 50 other websites.

- Really good HD in the more recent videos. The content is very good in terms of quality.
Cons: - Although the site is a solo model type it doesn't really connect the girl to the audience. No forums or chats, no special request videos section or web-chats. It's good content but why not go the extra step and make it an interactive experience?

- It's only one model who doesn't have sex or do anal. How often can you see the same girl play with herself? On the positive side the network access compensates more than enough, offering access to many sites.

- Lack of a search function is bothersome at times. A category search (strip, play with self, roleplay, etc. ) would have helped.

- An update schedule would have also been nice.

- Many of the videos are cut after 12 minutes in several parts. This can get frustrating as you have to download 3 videos for one scene.

- Interviews with the girl would have made the site much better, helped us connect to her.
Bottom Line: Overall the site is nice for a solo girl site. There is a lot of content and the model looks beautiful, especially with pony tails.

My main problem was that the site doesn't try to establish a connection between the users and the model. Solo sites work well when the girl responds to users, does videos that they ask her to do, chats with them and so on. Even something as simple as adding a brief interview at the beginning of each video would help. Having her say a few silly things about her week would make people feel closer and enjoy the site more, IMO.

Also in many of the videos the soundtrack covers her noises or she doesn't make any...this results in a somewhat awkward video. More natural sounds, maybe let her play with herself until she cums and record that...I think it would make for a much better site.

Finally, I feel like the girl used to look a lot better in the older videos, which is a shame since the HD is so crisp and nice, but this could be just me so no points off for that.

What I am taking points off are the lack of a search function, no photo zipped archives, no easy to access update schedule...small things that gather up to make for a slightly less than satisfying experience.

What brings the grade back up is that cute smile Kelly has in some videos, the slight awkwardness when she fingers herself and those huge, gorgeous eyes. A great model and a site that could be improved.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


PinkPanther (46) She had a forum when this site first opened. But as she became less involved, the forum was more a place for members to complain about how uninvolved she was and that the site wasn't improving - so they solved that by doing away with the forum.
09-19-09  09:16am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.