Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Exploited Secretaries

Exploited Secretaries (0)

james4096 (126) 08-25-09  02:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Video resolution is good
- Zip downloads for photosets
- No DRM or apparent download restrictions
- Bonus access to 5 sites
- Exclusive content
Cons: - Not much content, only 25 scenes
- Site does not update
- No penetration, only blowjobs.
- Photo rez isn't great
- A little overpriced, even considering the size of the entire network
- The secretary theme is too common
Bottom Line: Let me first mention that this site is all blow jobs. No intercourse. The title and maybe even the previews, do not indicate that. It's not that I mind or anything, I've joined my share of BJ sites. I'm just saying, some people might not know. The scenes are all very similar, a guy is interviewing a girl wearing glasses for a secretary position. They chick ends up blowing the man to get the job. The action is okay. The ladies in the scenes aren't big pornstars; most of these girls have probably only done a few scenes for other small sites. Also, I don't think any of them had implants. None of them were drop dead georgeous, but I found almost all of them to be at least cute or attractive. Overall I thought it was refreshing to see these women.

The are 1 or 2 qualites of wmv for each scene and one ipod m4v. The best quality is 1280x720 and 25000 kbps. That can be considered HD, so good for them. There are full scene downloads and also split into clips.

The photos are around 803x1200. That's not very good. There are zip photo downloads for each scene. Some of the older sets only have caps as opposed to actual still photos.

Most of the scenes aren't dated, but if you consider the last dated one was in July of 2008 and there are only 5 or so after that, it is safe to say that they are through updating.

Obviously the whole secretary been done before and it has been done better. The video quality is pretty good, but the photos are lacking, so this is not for photo guys. You do get access to the other sites this company owns, but do not join this network just for this site. I only have access because its a bonus site for pantyjobs. Low recommendation for this one.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.

  Be the first to reply to james4096!

  Reply To Review

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.