Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Score HD

Score HD (2)

Active
84
james4096 (126) 07-26-09  09:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to score video archive & mobile site
- Video resolution is pretty good
- Zip photo downloads
- Pretty decent sized library
- Daily updates
- Great value at $19.95 sale price
- No DRM
Cons: - Flash ads on every page in the members area.
- Photos are screen caps only
- The trailers play automatically on the video pages(it gets annoying)
- Content is not totally exclusive
Bottom Line: If you're familiar with Score then you'll know what this site is about. If not then I'll tell you, Bit Tits. You'll find a lot of the popular big and massive tit models here. The quality and design is much better than what you might have seen on the old Score Video. Overall, I'd say this is a decent site. I wouldn't really call myself an big tit aficionado, but I'm always looking for new videos so I joined.

Here are the sites in the network:

SCORE
Voluptuous
XL Girls
18eighteen
Leg Sex
40Something
Bootylicious
Naughty Neighbors

You also get Score Video which has lots of older video content and Score 2 Go, which is geared towards mobiles/portables. Each month you get a loyalty bonus which means access to a new site. These are actual sites that you would have to pay for, not just crap feeds, though they can be small.

I didn't notice a daily download limit, but I should mention you are allowed up to 6 video downloads at one time, but you can still browse while downloading.

There are currently 680 videos in Score HD, and that doesn't include the stuff from Score Video. The top quality full scene videos are wmv's at 1280x720 and 3600kpbs or better. These are actually HD videos and look pretty good. If you have an older computer or laptop you may want to stick to the medium quality 854x480(1600kbps). The videos are also offered split into parts if you prefer.

This site is not for picture lovers. The only have screen caps from the video scenes. Would it be that big of a deal to shoot some photos of the girl before the scene starts at least? They are available in zips though, but they are blurry.

As you can tell by the network list, this network has a good little variety of sites that should satisfy more than one taste. I should stress that this is mostly for big boob lovers. Sure the videos for Leg Sex are pretty good by leg enthusiast standards, but what Score does best is big tits. So, if you're into big big titties, then I recommend this site. If you like it, stick around for the loyalty bonus sites, normally you'd pay $20+ for those anyway.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

RagingBuddhist (63) Pretty much have one question - Are they "big by good genes" or "big by good ol' Dr. Gene"?
07-26-09  12:39pm

Reply To Message

2

james4096 (126) REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :

Good question.
Eh, little bit of both. You will see some chicks in there with mega implants, but also some with big natts. I don't know for sure cause I'm no expert, but they usually have a natural keyword in there if they are.

But everybody should be warned that some of the girls, especially the natural ones, may be a bit thicker every where else too. Especially in XL girls and Voluptuous.

To really appreciate this site you gotta like really big tits, not brazzers tits. Not for everybody.

07-26-09  01:15pm

Reply To Message

3

Monahan (38) REPLY TO #2 - james4096 :

Now that's a term I can understand. Brazzer tits are, by and large, enhanced with aftermarket adjustments by Dr. Gene and are becoming a total turn-off.

Naturals are best, by far.

When I was a Score member a few years back when the quality was lousy and the DRM was in force, at least the models were mostly (not always) natural.

And as James says, there were some "thick" ones in there with very large naturals bouncing on their very large bellies, but that's just fine. The assortment was good back then but the price and the HD have me interested; very interested.

Great review James. Thanks.

07-26-09  08:35pm

Reply To Message

4

GCode (101) Ah, this is what I'm talking about! Glad to see you found a site that you liked recently :)

Keep up the reviews lately, they have been great.

See ya around.

07-27-09  07:02pm

Reply To Message

5

messmer (137) Great review, James. One question: How large are the watermarks on some of the picture sets in the sub-sites now. I know that a couple of years ago 40plus and XL Girls were almost unwatchable because the logos were so huge. Are they more discrete now, and when it comes to the videos how intrusive are they in them? Thanks.
07-28-09  12:25pm

Reply To Message

6

james4096 (126) REPLY TO #5 - messmer :

thanks messmer.

All the content for the new videos on every Score HD site have the same silver Score HD logo in the bottom right hand corner. You can see it on the preview page. The images are screen caps(same rez) so they show the same watermark. I'm not sure if that's an improvement. I've seen better, but i've also seen worse though. It's bigger than it could be, and you can't see through it, but a least they keep it in the corner. You get used to it. The stuff in the older score(640x360) video just has scorevideo.com along the bottom.

07-28-09  01:01pm

Reply To Message

7

messmer (137) REPLY TO #6 - james4096 :

Thanks for the prompt reply and the info, James. Bottom right I can handle. :-)
07-28-09  01:21pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.