Teen Models Review by MargulisAZ

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

User Review

A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Teen Models (0)

Active

MargulisAZ (84)

07-22-09 01:20am

TRUST USER? YES (44), NO (1)

Status:

Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).

Pros:

102 vids already (all with preview clips and all have full download option or can be viewed in parts)
WMV (HD-1280 X 720 or 640 x 360) Quicktime (HD - 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, or 640 x 360) Also Ipod, psp, and iphone options.
186 photo sets (Can download full set in zip files of 3 different quality options, or view in browser)
Frequent updates (1 photo set per day and 3 videos per week)
Ultra fast downloads (2.5-3.0 mb/s)
All content is exclusive.
Access to Silver Sinema videos which also update and are all exclusive (1791 scenes currently)
Site has a great extreme edge with stuff like fisting and large toy use.
Great communication from staff.
Option to rate and comment on models.
Sneak peek area to view upcoming updates.
No unattractive models.
Site is very easy to navigate.

Cons:

Web site name is a poor choice as many of these models are not teens and it is just too generic in general.
Most of these models have been seen frequently on other sites.
Extreme updates can be hit or miss as some girls really take a fisting or use a toy well while others just do pseudo fisting or weakly work the toys.
No option to view all picture sets on one page when viewing in browser. Sets are usually split into 5 or more pages you have to cycle through.
A few pic sets that definitely should have had a video as well (see point 5 below)

Bottom Line:

I've never seen a site pop onto the scene as high of quality of Teen Models. NEVER. It's brand new and already rivals sites that have been out for 5-10 years. If not in quantity (which is pretty good as it is and will definitely get better over time) then for sure in quality.

1. There are basically two sections of the site. what seems to be the native exclusive content of Teen Models and then the extra stuff that comes from Silver Sinema (this is in a separate section, not mixed in with Teen Models content). The native Teen Model content is the best in my opinion, but it doesn't have near the quantity of Silver Sinema's. Also, you will find your hardcore content in the Silver Sinema section, as Teen Models has only solo and lesbian content. Still, I think there is a good balance because the Silver Sinema content features the same model quality, it's just in a different section, so if you're looking for hardcore just head over there. Silver Sinema section also contains the US models in conjunction with euro models, while Teen Models area is all euro models from what I saw.

2. One of the biggest draws is that this site also has a very nice amount of more extreme content that you don't always see with other sites such as fisting, large toy use, intense anal and so forth. I'm not really an anal fan myself but I'm sure some others will like that. The only complaint I have so far, which was addressed in the cons, is that some of the scenes just don't totally succeed as extreme. Maybe a girl has a huge toy but can barely get it in at all and doesn't really use it, or a fisting scene has a girl with too tight a pussy to really be fisting so the hand barely goes in at all. Keep in mind there are a good amount of really good extreme shoots as well, it would just be nice if ALL of the extreme shoots were full extreme and not just "attempts at extreme". It would also be nice to see a few US models thrown in the mix taking a fist or something since it's rare to see US models doing so with the laws here.

3. The frequent updates on the site is very nice and the other little bonuses are cool too such as being able to comment on particular models and the sneak peek section. I also must note that the download speeds for me were INSANELY fast. I could download a 500 mb file in just a few minutes, which is awesome.

4. The staff seems to be very willing to communicate with the consumer also which is a very big plus. I've sent a few e-mails and received very prompt replies to my questions and comments.

5. One more thing, there were a decent few pic sets that would have been AWESOME with a video to go with it of the scene, but there is just the pic set and no corresponding video which was disappointing.

Overall I highly recommend this site. It's already probably one of the best out there and hopefully will just continue to get better over time.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	Wittyguy (89)	Great review, thanks for taking the leap and being the 1st PU'er to post a review. I thought it looked it pretty good so it's on my list of places to venture to in the future.	07-22-09 01:13pm Reply To Message
2	Denner (233)	Has to agree with Wittyguy - a very fine review - and a great help. Had my eyes on this one (after Droolers info) - and along with Zemani - this site looks like a bit of something new in the softcore area.... My only doubt is here about the never ending search for NEW stuff/NEW models - and like MargulisAZ states in the cons: "Most of these models have been seen frequently on other sites." I also got that impresion too from the preview. Still it sure seems worth a try...	07-23-09 05:39am Reply To Message
3	TeenModels (15) Webmaster	REPLY TO #2 - Denner : Thanks for the reviews and comments guys. It really helps us make the site to your liking as much as possible. The hunt for the hottest girls continues. We just finished up some amazing shoots in Budapest and we are heading to Russia and Ukraine next month to try and get more girls that are fresh to these type of sites. Aside from this we are shooting a few brand new girls from California as well. Denner, I know you see a lot of the same girls on the same sites. However, my goal is to get them all to do things they don't normally do on all of these sites. Huge toys, fisting, anal, etc. It's an ongoing challenge but this last round of shoots was amazing. Take care and thanks for the comments	07-23-09 09:27am Reply To Message
4	GCode (101)	Just a few questions that will help me in deciding to put this site on my list of sites to join: 1. What is the resolution of the photos, you state 3 different sizes but not what the sizes are. 2. Are these photo sets proper photo shoots? If they are, are they accompyning photo shoots to the videos? Meaning, are these shoots similar in location and outfits as the videos provided? Any help would be great, thanks.	07-23-09 08:42pm Reply To Message
5	MargulisAZ (84)	REPLY TO #4 - GCode : 1. Small - 535 x 800 px, medium - 1600 x 1070 px, large - 3000 x 2008 px 2. I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "proper" photo shoots, but I think you mean are they meant to be photo shoots as opposed to just video screen captures or something of the sort. If that's how you mean it, then the answer is yes, they are proper photo shoots. Some of the photo shoots do accompany a video shoot, but they are still different, the photo shoot may be in the same location with the same outfit, but it is not just screen captures and often times something will be a little different like a different toy used or something. Other times there are photo shoots that do not have a video associated with it at all.	07-24-09 01:52am Reply To Message
6	GCode (101)	REPLY TO #5 - MargulisAZ : Thanks for the info and by proper shoots I did mean exactly what you thought by not being video stills. You gave me everything I needed to know and I appreciate it.	07-24-09 08:47am Reply To Message
7	dracken (246)	I just wanted to say that this site sounds very cool and the "attempt at extreme" sounds kinda kinky to be honest. I am just curious if the site features any boy-girl action. I saw some lesbian action but nothing in the direction of sex. Just curious...	08-03-09 03:05pm Reply To Message
8	MargulisAZ (84)	REPLY TO #7 - dracken : The only boy/girl is in the extra section that contains all the silver sinema content, but there is a ton of content there to look through.	08-03-09 03:16pm Reply To Message
9	dracken (246)	REPLY TO #8 - MargulisAZ : Thank you for the clarification. That was all I needed. The hardcore content made this site get on my wish-list anyhow.	08-03-09 03:20pm Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.