| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
badandy400 (103)
|
I site that "had it all" other than recent updates is hardly worth being bashed with a 50. A site no longer updating can be worth a few points taken off and certainly worth a warning, but a 50 is usually reserved for those sites that are true rip offs and in no way meet any of the expectations they instill into the viewers. This is not the first site you have called a complete failure only for not have enough content. It is important to remember that no every site will be a mega site the instant it starts up. In to cases now you have said that a site has good content that you enjoyed and it what you were looking for but gave 50s to the sites.
While I am not going to be jumpy about giving a negative trust just yet, it would be a good idea to consider what make a site a failure. In most members of PU opinions a site having great content can out weight so some extent a lack of content. Also, a site that no longer update might be worth for some people to join if they never have before to see what was their before the site slowed down.
|
07-08-09 07:29pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
jd10 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
I signed up for that about a month ago and I can tell you the above review is accurate - you get...approx. 100 pics small in size and poor quality for the 29.95 subscription fee...no videos at all....thus in my opinion the site is a complete "rip off" as they do advertise videos on the main page....I have signed up for other sites from the group also and they are also not worth the money...save your money on this one!
|
07-10-09 02:34pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
csbadger49 (6)
|
REPLY TO #2 - jd10 :
jd10,
Thanks for the warning on the other sites. I was tempted to give some of them a look.
csbadger49
|
07-10-09 06:23pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
csbadger49 (6)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
badandy400,
Your points are valid. I went into this thinking it would be a bit of a specialty site. But I just didn't feel it was worth the money and the intro page is definately misleading. That is probably what pissed me off and resulted in the score of 50 - very misleading advertising, even to the video on the sign-up page that doesn't match anything on the inside. The lady definately has a lot to offer but is ripping us off.
Thanks for your thoughts. I guess I'm just a very hard grader!
|
07-10-09 06:26pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
dougie (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - jd10 :
I am only replying here as I am a firm believer in review site being accurate and having just recently joined a couple of the sites in the AD group I feel this review is unfair.
I actually counted the photos on Gemma's site and there are 1055 currently, not 100 as the reviewer stated.
Some of the other sites within the group, particularly there dogging site is most definitely worth a look, to date it is the only site I have found with genuine UK dogging content
|
02-06-10 03:15pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
jd10 (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - dougie :
Call them as I see them Dougie!....my personal opinion is that the site is a rip off, hence the reason I supported the initial reviews low score....I actually do not have time to count photos on a website...but I do remember the photos being of poor quality....what ticked me off the most with this site however was that they displayed a video on the tour page as a teaser and sure enough no videos were inside when I got into the members area....quite frankly fraud in my opinion and hefty a one at that given the sites member subscription fee. I also joined this group "dogging" website previous to joining Gemma's and although better than Gemma's site.....still not worth the price of admission.
|
03-01-10 04:22pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Jayne (6)
Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #6 - jd10 :
Hardly a hefty subscription fee when you get access to 8 websites
|
12-24-12 06:41pm
Reply To Message
|
