Review Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
GCode (101)
|
Pretty good information in a short n' sweet review. The largest point that I'd have to agree with is your statement about advertising HD when they are in no way even close. I'm finding more and more sites are doing this and not even spurting out a high resolution to begin with. Now it's obvious that true hd that are in the realm of blu-ray would be downright ridiculous in size for download, a site should always tell the correct resolution and bitrate for their movies. It's always funny when a site claims HD and they are at 640 X 480 or 720 X 480 and less than 1000 kbps.
But, my question to you is about your definition of quality of videos here. Are you saying that just because the videos are not above 960 resolution means they are bad quality or is it a combo of both the resolution and clarity of the video. I have seen some great looking videos at less than this resolution with a decent bitrate and don't really feel that the resolution needed to be any higher to get a good, clear video. I was just wondering what your thoughts were on this based on your wording in the review.
However, the price alone at $50 is swaying me away from the site in the first place, I just wanted to discuss the HD thing because this seems to be a hot topic recently with a lot of discussion. Take care.
|
06-08-09 07:17pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
tehlupy1 (3)
|
REPLY TO #1 - GCode :
You are right, I did not comment on the quality, as I should have. The 960x540 videos @ 3.17 Mb/s bitrate is actually good. This is a much higher quality than you find on many sites. Heck, its a higher rate than some sites give to their 1280x720 vids. This makes the videos passable at 200% zoom for those like me on big monitors at hi res (2560x1600), but this still does not make up for being lied to about them being HD given the hefty price tag.
So, video quality is good, miss-advertised resolution is bad.
I should have also provided the following:
Videos from the sites in 960x540@3Mbs range from ~17-31 minutes in length and 400-700MB in size.
Seven of the twelve sites included 960x540 videos. Some many more than others.
I am just into vids, so no comment on pics which are average. 1280x853 / ~250kb
|
06-10-09 04:49pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
