Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club (3)

Newbie
65*
tehlupy1 (3) 06-08-09  04:05pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Really cute girls.
2. Multiple sites.
Cons: 1. DOES NOT HAVE HD video as advertised. Some (newer) videos are 960x540 @ 3 Mbp/s. This is not HD, this is enhanced SD.
2. Too expensive. $50 is not worth it, especially considering no HD.
3. Login system is a total load of crap. TCC members have to log into "memberall" URL servers, not "member", and even the TCC home page does not link to them correctly. And if that were not bad enough, you have to log in TWICE.
4. Site navigation is not very good.
5. No search feature for finding models.
6. Some model names vary across sites.
Bottom Line: The most disappointing thing was the lack of HD videos. This is something I did not see any of the previous reviewers comment on, but I think is a very important point. HD is 1280x720, 1440x1080 or 1920x1080.
There are many really cute models, which is what drew me to this site, but that is not worth it for enhanced SD or worse video quality.
They really need to clean up how the TCC users get access to the sites, and at least make it one login per site and fix the broken links on the TCC home page.
Overall, this site simply is not worth the quite high $50. I was offered an additional month at only $25 when I went to cancel, but I declined.
I did not comment on updates, as I have not been a member long enough to notice any.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

GCode (101) Pretty good information in a short n' sweet review. The largest point that I'd have to agree with is your statement about advertising HD when they are in no way even close. I'm finding more and more sites are doing this and not even spurting out a high resolution to begin with. Now it's obvious that true hd that are in the realm of blu-ray would be downright ridiculous in size for download, a site should always tell the correct resolution and bitrate for their movies. It's always funny when a site claims HD and they are at 640 X 480 or 720 X 480 and less than 1000 kbps.

But, my question to you is about your definition of quality of videos here. Are you saying that just because the videos are not above 960 resolution means they are bad quality or is it a combo of both the resolution and clarity of the video. I have seen some great looking videos at less than this resolution with a decent bitrate and don't really feel that the resolution needed to be any higher to get a good, clear video. I was just wondering what your thoughts were on this based on your wording in the review.

However, the price alone at $50 is swaying me away from the site in the first place, I just wanted to discuss the HD thing because this seems to be a hot topic recently with a lot of discussion. Take care.

06-08-09  07:17pm

Reply To Message

2

tehlupy1 (3) REPLY TO #1 - GCode :

You are right, I did not comment on the quality, as I should have. The 960x540 videos @ 3.17 Mb/s bitrate is actually good. This is a much higher quality than you find on many sites. Heck, its a higher rate than some sites give to their 1280x720 vids. This makes the videos passable at 200% zoom for those like me on big monitors at hi res (2560x1600), but this still does not make up for being lied to about them being HD given the hefty price tag.

So, video quality is good, miss-advertised resolution is bad.

I should have also provided the following:
Videos from the sites in 960x540@3Mbs range from ~17-31 minutes in length and 400-700MB in size.
Seven of the twelve sites included 960x540 videos. Some many more than others.
I am just into vids, so no comment on pics which are average. 1280x853 / ~250kb

06-10-09  04:49pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.