Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Pantyhose Lane

Pantyhose Lane (0)

Active
65
mbaya (356) 06-04-09  06:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM or other download restrictions.
-Combination of two niches I like, Asian women and pantyhose. Not exclusively Asians though.
-Updates almost every day going back to 8/1/2008.
-Photos are 1200x780 and decent crispness.
-297 photo sets. Each has 50 to 70 photos.
Cons: -105 videos. The quality is completely unacceptable at 320x240 for nearly every video. A few are 720x480, but with a bitrate of 327.
-Most videos have only one option-WMV. Some are only Realtime.
-No whole video downloads, only clips.
-No streaming options.
-Photos cannot be zipdownloaded.
Bottom Line: Even without high expectations, the site was a disappointment. Since I am much more into videos than photos, I consider the site to be a disaster. I basically agree with the review by Cucuta, but I feel that it is incomplete regarding some aspects that I very much care about.

The videos are a complete waste of time as well as hard drive space. The quality is as weak (320x240 and grainy) as you can find anywhere, even on amateur sites. The camerawork is invariably poor, missing that quality of eroticism that they should be aiming for. Many of the videos and photosets are overexposed, or have poor coloring, even oversaturation. For a site with many attractive models, this is simply incredible.

The photos are ok and the quantity is good for a niche site. They are softcore, glamour type sets that tease and sometimes are a little more explicit.

The site was first listed on TBP in June 2005, but the oldest material is from 8/2008. There is some older "guest" photo sets from 2004 to 2006. They are promos for other sites, so they are definitely not exclusive. What happened from 2006 to 2008?

After downloading a few videos and a peek at the photos, I complained to the site about the lack of quality. Days later, I have no response, no offer of a refund, only silence. In the email I got from the site after signing up, I was assured of a one hour response time to customer emails. Not recommended for video lovers, and only a weak maybe for those interested in glamour photos.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

roseman (253) thanks for the info!
06-09-09  01:03am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.