Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Melissa Midwest

Melissa Midwest (0)

Newbie
55*
sycophant85 (0) 05-26-09  05:17pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Melissa is hot as hell and has a great personality.
Cons: Melissa has not done a new picture set or cam show since January 2009. Updates are just reruns of old picture sets or pictures taken of past cam shows, which kinda are new, but not.
Bottom Line: Not worth $30 a month for what you get. of the other sites included, only FoxyJacky is even remotely updated. She promises new material, but does not deliver. The free galleries from her site give you everything from the site for free.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

RagingBuddhist (63) Would still be nice to know some details about what is on the site. Numbers of pictures? Videos? Size and resolution?
05-26-09  10:04pm

Reply To Message

2

asmith12 (124) REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :

IMHO his review is still MUCH MORE useful than facts like number of pictures (which can be easily found on TBP, and even if they're not 100% up to date, they're most likely pretty close):

380+ Photo Shoots (avg. 100 pics each)
Hi-Res Pics: N, Model Index: N, Small & Large Pics: N, ZIP Files: N
Watermarks: Yes, medium-sized (all pictures).
Videos: 205+ Videos (approx. 4 min. each)
Full Scenes: N, Multi-Bandwidth: N, Vid Caps: N
Watermarks: Yes, medium-sized (all videos).

05-27-09  05:58am

Reply To Message

3

sycophant85 (0) REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :

The number of pictures in a set ranges from 40 to 80 and the quality ranges from ok to crappy. She definately does NOT have a professional photographer. You can get the a sample of the quality from any of her free galleries. Her videos run about 5 minutes at the most and well, suck. They are poorly lighted most of the time and not of professional quality. Again, click on the free video sample on her site to get a sample of the quality. My biggest gripe with the site is the lack of any new material. 30 bucks a month is a lot to pay for stuff you have already seen or picture sets of cam shows she did 2 years ago. Her forum page now basically is her posting once a week telling her members how busy she is that she is going to go out a party that weekend.
It is not a bad site, just not worth 30 bucks a month.

05-27-09  06:17am

Reply To Message

4

Cybertoad (102) Actually TBP has many reviews two or three years old
there are sites that they reviewed that had 10 vids now have over 500. And were a single site and now a network.
I love TBP but unless the sites have been reviewed in the last year or so I disagree the not having specs is ok.
In fact a reviewer doing that saves me the pain in the ass job of looking for something they already know.

sycophant85 is still new, my advice read others reviews
those that have posted allot of review and see their feedback to see what other need and want in a review.

Keep em coming and hey join the forum there is lots of good advice out there too.


Cybertoad.

05-27-09  08:13am

Reply To Message

5

badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :

I will have to agree that while he did not give statistical data he did provide useful information. Informed us of his grievance and told us way he feels that way. Off course I like the statistical data, but if the site blows then I guess it is not all that important. Besides, usually when a new guy comes to complaint about a site all the basically say is "this site suck" and that is all. So all in all, not bad by me.
05-27-09  03:51pm

Reply To Message

6

PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #5 - badandy400 :

I agree - most reviews this short give you nothing - this site is the best ever or this site is the worst ever. This reviewer fleshed out the few points that were made, which is more than most minimal reviewers do.
05-27-09  07:52pm

Reply To Message

7

RagingBuddhist (63) The only reason I responded to the review is because I wanted a recent user's take on the site. I've looked at this site as a "possible" for a while now and simply wanted some details. But, to me, what he put up only qualifies as a great comment.
05-27-09  10:31pm

Reply To Message

8

sycophant85 (0) REPLY TO #7 - RagingBuddhist :

RagingBuddhist is right, mine is not a review per say, but more of a comment. I am a current member of the site, and all the other reviews are accurate as far as the details of the site. What has changed, is that it seems she is no longer actively involved in the site. You get a boatload of content with her site, and FoxyJacky, SweetAdri and MelissaCamvideos are included. It's just that FoxyJacky is the only one who does camshows and anything that resembles new content. The bottom line is this, you can go to a site such as CoedCherry.com and get most of the best pictures for free.
05-28-09  06:44am

Reply To Message

9

GCode (101) REPLY TO #7 - RagingBuddhist :

I agree with the fact that this review was better posted as a comment to tell us that the site is no longer updating. While this is great info for a review, I do believe tech stuff can easily be thrown in there for 1 line in the pros or cons or in bottom line and the user could describe what is in the scenes more in full to create a more in depth review. My philosophy is bigger is better, I do find users who do short and sweet reviews as trustworthy as others.

But let's get for real, if you are actually planning on joining the site and giving YOUR money to them, everyone would want more details than this. This review just leaves anyone as a potential consumer to ask more questions which RagingBuddhist did and rightfully so in my honest opinion. If you are just looking to read this as never being interested in the first place, it adds a fact that you now know the site is no updating which is a great comment.

05-28-09  10:16am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.