Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit VideoBox

VideoBox (3)

Hbe22bbm (0) 05-21-09  10:18am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (2)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Definetly best bang for the buck
+ Great search engine
+ good video quality (premium)
Cons: - no pictures
- could use more glamour / solo / tease (more "soft" porn)
Bottom Line: The only site i subscribe to - again and again and again :)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


lk2fireone (196) Your review is very short on details. If you have the time, you should read the thread, "What should a PU review include?", which is found at:


If you don't have the time or patience to read the entire thread, which is only 2 pages long, you can read 2 of the more important posts of the thread:

1. The introductory post #1, by Wittyguy, which explains what he thinks a good review should include.

2. Post #7, the cheat sheet created by Toadsith, which is a detailed listing of the main factors many PU members want to see in a review.

The review you write is your own personal creation, based on your own ideas and opinions and facts, but to have value for the PU site members, some specific tech details, site numbers (number of photos, videos, etc.), and your own opinions should be included.

05-21-09  12:54pm

Reply To Message


uscue (39) One thing to note about that I noticed a lot of people do for various sites: you shouldn't include a con for something that should not be expected at that site. Example: Videobox - as the name suggests - is a site for videos. They don't advertise pictures or want pictures..it's strictly a site for videos. Therefore, the absence of pictures shouldn't be a con.

That's like going to Blacks on Blondes and for cons writing "there are no white guys". That would be like going to Exploited Moms and for cons writing" all the women are MILFs, no young teens in the scenes".

Other than that, i agree that VB is a site to keep subscribing to

05-21-09  09:48pm

Reply To Message


asmith12 (124) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

> your own opinions should be included.
ESPECIALLY your own opinions.

05-22-09  12:06am

Reply To Message


Cybertoad (Disabled) This is a great site I do not doubt,
But to give a 98 is near perfect and would in
MHO, need far more detail for me to agree with a 98.
I gave it a 94 in my review but gave details.
Please try and entice to visitors to read your reviews
by supplying something to read, and you own take and opinions

05-22-09  10:27am

Reply To Message


PinkPanther (46) As others have said, this review is lacking anything that makes it a review

Definitely best bang for the buck - why? what makes it so good?

Great search engine - really? what about this search engine makes it so good?

Good video quality (premium) - good - not excellent? For a 98 score? Does it look good full-screen? Is it DVD quality?

Fleshing out the things that you do say, however minimal they are, would make your review more valuable to other people that read it.

05-22-09  06:16pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.