Pier 999 Comment : Join Page Needs "Correction"

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

User Comment

A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Pier 999 (0)

Drooler (218)	05-17-09 03:31am
	TRUST USER? YES (84), NO (0)

Join Page Needs "Correction"

From the Pier999 join page (.../join.html):
"PiER999 is not like other adult paysites out there. With all exclusive content shot by our own photographers we can gaurantee that you will get fresh, never-seen-before pictures and videos everyday, 5 days a week."

"As a net surfer, we know how it feels being cheated, we have been cheated before. So, when we started our own website we promised ourselves that we will never lie to our members. We honestly present our content here. You have seen what you will get when you become a member."

It's been months since they've had all-exclusive content. I must say that they've been doing the non-exclusive stuff at 2000 pixels well (e.g. Lola as Nina Blond, March 20, very nice!), but it's not what they're advertising.

But now things have taken a turn for the worse. Since April 21st, they've been posting a lot of older-looking galleries at 1024 pixels. Makes that "New 2000 Pixel!" at the top left of the public home page ring even hollower than before (their really exclusive stuff has never been larger than 1500 pixels). The 1024s also have smaller thumbs (90x120) vs. their more common 116x175 for sets in larger sizes.

FYI, here's a list of girls who "max" at 1024: Carlita Connors, Dalila Paul (Ashton Grey), Fujiko Miles, Gloria Ardell (Sarah Blake), Jadra East (Adele Stephens in a rare hardcore set), Jana Cova, Kayla Quinn, Loni Xavier, Monique Alexander, Sable Randi, Silvie Thomas.

I think it's well past time for Pier999 to cut the BS and come clean. What you read at the start of this comment is their BLATANT false advertising. If challenged, I'm prepared to point out a number of sets on Pier999 that are non-exclusive.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (1)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	Denner (233)	Notice this comment from the Drooler - especially present AND former "fans" of Pier999 - this user is/was one. Once a fine site - today it seems like they do not give a damn about providing updates for members. And BTW: The video-updates are - again - misserable....	05-17-09 06:20am Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.