Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Shemale Yum

Shemale Yum (0)

zergling (8) 05-12-09  08:50pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -some models that are exclusive to shemaleyum.com
-great new layout which is very user freindly
-regluar updates each week
-a huge model data base
***camera work has improved dramatically over the last few months i have changed the review score accordingly***
Cons: -site is expensive
-some poor camera work
-large updates which focus on quantity over quality
-lack of cumshots
Bottom Line: shemale yum has been around a long time had has brought us some great girls over the years.there data base is huge which will keep you busy for months if you new to the site.first off most the content is solo so dont expect a huge ammount of hardcore content. the pics sets are good quality and have zip downloads.the videos on the other hand vary alot most of the new videos are (640x480)with varying bitrates there is also a smaller option (320x240)which is nt great.the more older vids are rather average which can be expected as was technology at the time alot seem to be realplayer,divx format.on the whole the new videos are good quality.the camera work can also very depending on the camera man some clips seem to a simply strip tease leading onto the model playing with herself,others the camera man can get invovled and have a play himself.now new models on the site will generally have one shoot seperated into two or three updates which i think is pretty appauling more often that not you have to wait months to see a models cumshot which is exteremly important to a shemale fan like myself so dont expect to see a cumshot each time a girl is updated or shot for the first time.on the whole shemaleyum.com is a good site yes it is expensive and it has its downfalls but no and a i repeat no other website can delivery the models shemaleyum.com does which is a big plus

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


GCode (101) I have to agree with your points 100%. I am not a fan of places that goes with the quantity of quality aspect. The breaking up of videos can be a burden when you are waiting for updates because it appears I am in the same boat as you when it comes to cumshots, waiting stinks. It appears this system works for some and since the site has been around so much, there must be a lot of cumming content but I do feel your pain when it comes to how they update. Stripping updates just don't do it for me personally and I believe you feel the same way too.

Overall, good start and welcome to PU. I look forward to your other reviews.

05-12-09  09:06pm

Reply To Message


zergling (8) REPLY TO #1 - GCode :

yeah i dont think much of the shooting policy but your right some people must like it i quess.i hope this first review was nt to bad i just spoke honestly i hope i was nt to negative cos the site is good but some issues need addressing.
05-12-09  09:42pm

Reply To Message


GCode (101) REPLY TO #2 - zergling :

The review is not bad at all and well founded. That's why this place is here: to provide useful info from users to get a better outlook and discussions on sites that we love or hate. These are your opinions and I agree with them on the most part. This company (grooby) does provide great sites in this small and great niche (TS) but I have always thought their updating policy was by far not the best approach. Thanks for your thoughts and review, hope you can provide some more in the future.
05-12-09  09:51pm

Reply To Message


seanchai (17)
Thanks for the review and comments.
I'd like to clarify a few points:

1. We do not focus on quantity over quality. We do focus on showing a wide range of transgenders, so not all may be to your taste but appeal to others. This doesn't mean it's poor quality material. We update about 7-8 sets per week so we hope to get at least a good handful that appeal to each member.

2. You are correct in stating we are mainly a solo site, HOWEVER, we update a full hardcore scene as well as all the solos, every 2 weeks, featuring some of the best models in the USA. These are 150 photos + and usually 20-30 mins of edited, HD 640x480 quality WMV's. These models are not cheap Brazilian content but all American. Given that these scenes are what many companies put out on DVD's - and that you get 26+ a year, it's really fairly good amount of hardcore in addition. However, if your looking for a specific hardcore site, then there are better Grooby options.

3. Your point about us splitting sets is entirely mis-guiding. We shoot usually 2 very different solo sets of the same model, maybe in a schoolgirl uniform on a bed for the 1st set, and then in lingerie, different hair, etc. with a different background. Each set is unique in it's own right and appeals to people with different fetishes, not just the cum fetish which you have. Each set has 100+ photos, full nudity, erections, spread ass and a full video with it. YES, only in one of the sets will the model cum - as few models can cum twice within a few hrs. As we show 7-8 models a week, usually 3-4 are from the first set, and 3-4 from the second "cumshot" set.

4. Stating the site is expensive, is misleading also. We're cheaper than some of our competitors showing less quality material, we show 32+ US/European models per month all with plenty of material. Look at the price of DVD's and then compare to what you are getting on Shemale Yum. We also have plenty of discount options available if you click our pay by mail, join button that brings the sites down to under $19.99 a month. The added bonuses of discounts on other sites of ours, and being one of the most honest companies in the business (no-prechecked crossales, excellent customer service, etc.) really make this on of the few sites, that does give you complete value for money.

Our forum area is now free and we have quite a few girls chatting there, check it out on the site and see why we have more members than any other TS site, why we've been the top site for over 12 yrs, and why more models work for us than any other TS company.

Thanks again.

05-13-09  10:47am

Reply To Message


zergling (8) REPLY TO #4 - seanchai :

hello seanchai my point about the updates is that when you do shoot a girl you shoot her two even three times before you may see a cumshot i know for a fact buddy wood uses this approach i think to most shemale fans like myself is rather annoying and why should a hard paying member have to wait months to see the money shot its very important a set just does nt seem complete without the cumshot.i know some girs have trouble producing cumshots thats fine we all understand but some girls on the site can produce a huge load on demand.i just tink the shoot policy is bogus but thats just me.i think alot of members would agree this is one of the reasons i recently cancelled my membership.but in all due respects shemaleyum.com is a good site and as i said you get the best models on the net thanks for your reply
05-13-09  08:05pm

Reply To Message


seanchai (17)
REPLY TO #5 - zergling :

I understand what your saying, but you can't have all ways.

Under what you want - which is a cum shot in every shoot, we could only provide about 4 sets per week instead of the 7-8 now. We couldn't do 8 cum shot sets a week, the budget just doesn't allow it. Also as plenty of members aren't as interested in the cum shot but other aspects ... we'd lose them, further hindering.

Just click on the ones on the new search feature that say, "cumshot" and ignore the rest!

I'm not trying to be obtuse but your criticism although makes sense to you, couldn't really be doable. I don't know any site that puts up 7-8 US model cumshots per week?
Thanks again for your explanation and feedback.,

05-13-09  08:09pm

Reply To Message


zergling (8) recently got absued from the webmaster for simply stating what i thought was wrong with the site which is oddly enough what i thought the forum was for.
07-07-10  08:23pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.