Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club (2)

Dmander6 (0) 05-08-09  01:29pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (5)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Best TEEN site on the web currently!
Excellent for fans cute teen girls getting abused with raw sex.
A lot of deep throat face fucking.
Super hot ANAL penetration of cute teen girl looking pained and screaming.
VERY exciting and pleasing to watch.
Cons: No zip files
No high rez pictures
No daily updates
Bottom Line: Fantastic site! No fake acting. Just great if you like the look of a cute teen girl face, down on her knees getting rammed in the ass. The most satisfying ring of sites I have come across. JUST GREAT -a shame that there is not hundreds of sites like this

Reply To Review

Review Replies (11)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Wittyguy (105) Let me start by saying welcome to PU. I see that you've been busy the last day or two posting comments and reviews. While I respect the right of people to say what they want here, you need to be doing a better job than what you are. For example, you gave this site a "100" score even when there are no hi rez pics or zips. I can assure you that this site does not merit a 100 score.

I understand that everyone has personal preferences (your love of anal sex has been made clear) but when it comes to review scores you need to be more objective and provide more information. For example; how many vids / photo scenes are there, what size are the vids and pics, how often does it update, what is the search function like, etc. Most of your comments and reviews to date lack this info and are merely statements regarding your personal preferences. That does not help others who might read your reviews and comments when trying to decide whether or not to join a site. My advice would be to read some of the reviews posted by long term members to get a feel for what we're looking for. Otherwise no one is going to take you seriously here and you're going to start getting a lot of negative trust ratings warning others that your reviews and comments need work.

05-08-09  03:23pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) Welcome to PU. I must concur with Wittyguy on your review. I'm a past member of this network. I might have accepted a 90+ score. I just don't believe it is deserving of a 100% score. They have added a couple of new sites to the network, but that just mean that the same performer appears in more than one site doing about the same thing. The cost of this site is also a major issue. Unlike many others with similar content. They still charge about 60$ for a series of site that do not update as often as they could. At least you have given some info, but please expand. Anyone that considers this network worth 100% should be able to fill the pros and bottom line to cracking.
05-08-09  06:45pm

Reply To Message


Jay G (67) Have to agree with the others. I've belonged to probably close to 200 sites over the years and have never belonged to one that I'd give a 100 to, including Teen Core Club.

While I love the intensity of the sex on many of its sites, I can think of many things I's like seeing improved to make the routine of the scenes more interesting. I also had password issues and there was poor service for my issues...still many scenes were smoking hot.

Yet 100? I don't think so....

05-09-09  03:03am

Reply To Message


dogpile (0) yeah this review is a bit suspect. . . a 100. . hmmm glad i read these other comments .
05-09-09  04:13am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) Two things here:

1) This is the first review of a new PU - so maybe this user is just overwhelmed by this site. I remember when I first joined, for exampel the old 1ByDay - I could not remain calm by the pc....
So ok, give the guy a change - NOW he'll know that a 100 is very rare/quite unlikely at TBP/PU....

2) I see this PU is from Denmark - like me - do not think any user from here have any financial interest in this site - but ok, cannot be 100 procent sure... still give the PU the benefit of doubt, anyway.

05-09-09  07:44am

Reply To Message


PinkPanther (46) 100 on a site with no daily updates? According to PU guidelines, 100 is reserved for sites that could do little to improve. I understand that the impulse for newbies is to first do reviews that they like the most - that's what I did when I first joined and I also gave my favorite sites unreasonably high ratings.

But it's helpful, when you're going to review a site to look at the guidelines that are given about ratings, take a breath and think what rating the site REALLY deserves.

Besides that, to be honest, there's not much to your review. It doesn't give me any reasons why this site is so much better than Nubiles.net, which you're clearly acquainted with.

You say "no daily updates", but you don't give any indication of how often they do update - or if they do - or how many photo or vid sets are posted when they update - or how large the pics or vids are - or how long the vids are - or how many pics are in a photo set.

I understand that you really like the site, but you didn't give anybody else much info with your review, I'm afraid, and your rating doesn't seem to meet PU guidelines.

05-09-09  07:51am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) Could not edit my former reply in time so this to Dmander and others:

I have a knowledge of all the sites you just reviewed. What strikes me the most is the vast difference in scores. It seems strange - the lowest to the higest - and some of the sites do NOT differ much - apart from the Co.
And what does it mean when you ask for girls: "Crying"?

05-09-09  08:03am

Reply To Message


GCode (101) He posted a few comments and I had a small conversation with this user about teen sites and so on. I think it may be a case of over-enthusiasm on his/her part and being new. Of course, I'd like to give any new user the benefit of the doubt but it's obvious that this review contains vital info in the cons that could never make it an 100 site. He may not know that we really do take reviews pretty serious and just did an overly biased review score based on his love for the site and it's content. And obviously, we all love reviews that are opinion based that can be more bias than others, but when it gets in this realm it will get brought up. So, I suppose we can wait for his reaction and see what he thinks. Also, if he never logs back in then it's obvious shameless promotion. So, I suppose it's up to him to get his take on our comments at the point. By the way, Welcome and these above comments by these PU's are well founded, they are just trying to sway you in the right direction and provide constructive criticism.
05-09-09  11:31am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) Adding my 2 cents (U.S.) worth:

Welcome to PU. Always nice to see new members.

I really like your enthusiasm. Wish I had more of it myself.

It's really great to like a site so much, and want to share your knowledge of this great site with the rest of us.

But most members want a review that is not only enthusiastic, but filled with lots of details about the site. And even if you think the site is great, you need to give a score that is at least loosely based on the details/opinions you show in your review. A lot of PU members start to scream when a score of 100 is given, because they are mainly conservative in their scoring, and tend to give much lower scores even to sites they really like.

Again, welcome to PU, and hope to see many more reviews from you.

05-10-09  06:08am

Reply To Message


Wittyguy (105) Let me finish up here. I see that you changed the score on the site from "100" to "85" without adding any additional information to the review. Now, all that tells me is that you're just changing the score so you won't catch any more sh*t from others here. Now you're just being a hypocrite. Sorry if it seems like we are all jumping on you but you aren't starting off on a good footing here.
05-11-09  11:45am

Reply To Message


OneMan (27) REPLY TO #1 - Wittyguy :

Also, 4 sites have been reviewed with low scores....while the one he is "promoting" has been given a high score along with comparisons to the others.....this site is the "best on the net".

Note the dates of the other 4 reviews. All on the same day......

Sorry, this person has an agenda...it is blindingly obvious and should be ignored.

As more evidence, after the review had been posted, an unfavourable review appears, and this person then adds another "review" under the comment section.....even longer than his original review.

This is blatent defence of a site, in which he clearly has an interest.

Dmander6, clearly has an interest in Teen Core Club, and his reviews and comments should be removed. you don't need to be Columbo to see this.

06-16-09  12:39pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.