Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Christina Model

Christina Model (0)

james4096 (126) 04-15-09  05:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge photo collection going back over 5 years. More than 550 photo sets
- Some of the new videos are HD
- They make good on the with the biweekly photo updates promise
- She Now does 3 live webcam shows a month
Cons: - Content can get dull and repetitive
- Older video content is lower quality and too short
- Every photo is slightly buttonized with these weird edges
- Video page is a mess and hard to navigate
- No zip photoset downloads
Bottom Line: I remember seeing Christina's site years ago, but I was never interested in actually joining. She's known for her big natural, slightly sagging breasts and very poor fully clothed dancing.

These days she does actually get naked, well topless that is. She'll show off her tits but she is very shy about showing her bare ass or her bits, but technically she does get totally nude. She doesn't really touch herself down there, but she does use a vibrator in one of her newer videos(not naked though). Basically this site is an R-rated tease site(that's not necessarily a bad thing). There are hundreds of photosets going back to 2004 of Christina undressing out of different outfits. The videos are the same, she'll change in and out of a few outfits, dance around a little to lame music, pull her tits out and pose. Not bad, but they do get repetitive.

One problem with her is that in my opinion her stuff isn't that sexy. It's not bad really, she's kinda cute, her body is good and you can totally spank to her vids. Something is just missing. I think she's a little bit uncomfortable. I don't blame her, I blame her photographer/director. Also let me add that to her credit Christina's dancing has improved a little.

Recently Christina has started to do webcam shows for her members at a rate of 3 per month. These cam shows are similar to the content on her site and are 45-60 minutes. Not bad, just a little bonus. You can re-watch all the previous shows and there are about 6 right now.

The newer photos are 1000x1500. The photos look good, but every photo has slight buttonized edges. I found that very unnecessary. The older photos get smaller as you go further back, but not too bad. I should mention that unfortunately there are no zip files of the photos.

At the time of my review were 10 30 min HD videos split into 2 parts and 13 Standard Def(SD) vids also the same length. There are about 15 12 min movies and some 2 min preview for the videos she sells. Then 9 videos that are under a minute and very poor in quality. The new HD videos are 1280 x720 and they look pretty good. The SD are 640x480, and that means they look acceptable. Each new videos either HD or SD, not both. What this site does is release the first half of an HD videos then 1 week later the second half, and after that they do the same for one Standard Definition video. So that's means 1 15 minute video per week.

I might recommend this site for month, if you like Christina and don't mind an R-rated site. This recommendation has to do with the large volume of photosets she offers, and compared to most tease sites she has a lot. Things can get a little boring on this site but overall it's not bad. The price of the site is actually 24.95, at least that's what I paid. And for all you pervs don't expect to see anything from when she
wasn't legal, this site only goes back to 2004 thankfully

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


williamj (9) NO zips is a real bummer
04-15-09  06:16am

Reply To Message


mbaya (364) I really don't know anything about her. What was she doing when she wasn't legal? Did she have a site? Just curious.
04-15-09  06:34am

Reply To Message


james4096 (126) REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :

The company that ran her site had about 4 similar teen modeling sites. The girls were about 16 and posed in clothing which, let's just say was not age appropriate. Totally non-nude, nothing illegal, but it was no secret that it was a beat-off site. It all seemed very slimy. Actually one site closed after being featured on the national news, and the girls parents were charged with doing something not related to the site.

Later on the models moved on to doing topless after they got too old to just be standing around in bikinis. I stayed away from these site for years. This one and maybe another are still around, but I think only Christina is the only original model left.

Its kind of disturbing, if you look at girls like Peachez 18, well she used to be "Peachez 16" and have a teen "modeling site" now she's sucking dick and fingering herself on the internet.

I can't really judge them, they are young women in their 20's and I look at women doing a lot worse, but it's just the fact that their parents helped put them on this track. I watch porn, but I would never want my daughter to do it.

04-15-09  06:51am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.