Nakedby (1)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Most to all content is exclusive
+Archive going back to June 2006
+Updates with videos or photosets usually every other day
+Some really great quality photography with 3000px size photos beginning Feb. or March 2007 (2000 px is the most common large size to date)
+zip files
+some very HOT European women
+1 week trial membership gives access to all |
| Cons: |
-some photo sets have too much shadow/darkness or annoying blurriness
-photo sets vary in number of pics (but some are substantial)
-a few of the women aren't so appealing and there's too much fetish emphasis (to me, anyway) |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are into sofcore photos, this site is a good buy with the week-long membership price of $9.95. CCBill does the billing (reliable).
Women like Soraya, Amandine, and Radka Novacova (here as Tiffany) in exclusive material is a big plus.
Sorry, but I can't say anything about the videos (not usually interested in softcore videos).
They'd had a problem with their zips not working, but they fixed that after I was a member in January 2007 (rejoined in March, when the 3000px had started showing and the zips worked). So it seems it's getting attention from people managing it.
I'd rate it in the 90's if there was less fetish material and the darkness/blurriness.
Follow-Up:
For the past 2 months, 3000px has been the consistent large size (wasn't before then, though many galleries had it). But I'm lowering the score from 87 to 80. Just rejoined. Too often darkness, s/t fetishy stuff + rate of updates makes me think I scored it too high before. |
Reply To Review |
