Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit CFNM Secret

CFNM Secret (0)

mbaya (364) 03-20-09  08:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through Epoch.
-Discounted price through TBP.
-Part of a network of 26 sites. Claims to be the largest adult network on the web. This may be true as many of the sites are quite large.
-Every scene has oral and vaginal. Some have anal, some have lesbian. There wasn't any male humiliation at the level of a turnoff for me. Men are sex objects but not treated as badly as on some CFNM sites that go over the top in my opinion.
-Can use download managers.
Cons: -Presently updating only twice a month. Apparently RK doesn't have much confidence in the potential of the site as they say the reason is to make room for a new site.
-Only 25 updates. Many updates use the same girls and guys over and over. Needs growth in order to deserve a higher score.
-Claims to be voted the world's best network. I see this as a con as they never mention anywhere on the site as to who did the voting or when.
-Claims to offer unlimited access to all its sites. Never mentions the small daily download limit of only 4GBs. This site has 25 videos for a total of 8GBS and it took two days to download. This is simply not acceptible for a network this big. How long would it take to go through the entire network? Perhaps months if you don't download something every day.
-Downloadable only as WMV 720x480, 1462 kbs or MP4 for ipod. However you can download whole movies or clips.
-Typical California pornstar look.Too much makeup and jewelry make the girls seem overdone.
Bottom Line: I previously was a member of purecfnm.com so I am familiar with the genre. Pure is a British website and the girls are not as good looking, but more genuine. Another difference is in the level and type of sex. Pure has a lot of male humiliation, which I don't care for, very little vaginal, no anal or lesbian. I felt it was at its best in the bj scenes, and that is something that is a big plus here on secret. Every scene has bjs. The girls here are older pornstars of years ago, MILF age and the guys 5 to 10 years younger. They virtually attack the guys for sex. This is like a reverse gangbang in that 24 of the 25 scenes feature at least 2 girls. The guys say little or nothing and the girls seem interested in only what the guy has between his legs. Nice role reversal that I can appreciate. While there isn't the same kind of nudity involving the girls that you see in standard sex, the fact that there is vaginal in every scene keeps a sense of the girls being sexy. The only downside I see is the lack of breast visuals. The complaints on the site forum revolve around the fact that the focus is on the girls actions, not so much their physical assets. They are well dressed, with makeup and jewelry, but you just don't see what is expected in a mainstream site. Bottom line: Nice content, but not enough. Download limits hurt the fact that you also get a large network. The videos are of decent quality, but not HD.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.

  Be the first to reply to mbaya!

  Reply To Review

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.