Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Extreme Girl Network

Extreme Girl Network (0)

Active
70
badandy400 (103) 03-16-09  10:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Decent site size
-Access of many other sites on network and special bonus sites that are unrelated
-Loads of hardcore content
-Very hard action
-95% of videos have a "full" option
-No downlaod limits or DRM
-Site is very simply to navigate
Cons: -NO LONGER UPDATING as of 8-23-2007
-A bit pricy for just this site
-Videos need a lot of work in quality!
-Photos are just screen shots and NO ZIPs
-No search for different performers
-Watermark is larger than other sites on network
-Log in frequent, must be done from home page
-Files not names usefully
-No model search
Bottom Line: This site come with Extreme Alex, Sophia, Holly, Spit Swappers and several others. All of these sites are included in with a membership here. This site is a bit different than the other sites on the network.

The other sites focus on a single performer or a special topic such as spit swapping. This site does not feature a specific performer, thee are a good number of different women here. This site is all hardcore, very hardcore. Most scenes feature some sort of anal penetration and the majority of them feature double penetration.

The scenes usually start out with the woman clothed which is nice. I am not much a fan of scenes that skip this part. There is a very small plot to most of the scenes.

The video quality is much worse here, but I am not sure why. My only guess is that different people were making the content here as compared to the other sites. The videos at best look like low quality VHS and at worst is nearly unwatchable. Even the 2 MBit videos are nothing worth bragging about. For a 2007 site the videos are mostly subpar.

Quicky Rundown
106 Scenes
111 Files
40 Hours run time
24.8 GB of video
21-663 MB files evenly spread on size
2.01 MBit @ 640x480 and 877 KBit @320x240

Is this site worth joining?
In a word, NO. This site by itself is not worth joining at $30. The saving factor is the access to the other main sites and the many bonus sites. The site by itself would have gotten no more than a 62, and would have been lower if it did not have a good handful of content.

There are much better DP sites out there with watchable videos and actual photos. The only reason to join here is for access to the bonus sites and the other main site, which you can read my reviews individually.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to badandy400!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.