Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit My Sexy Kittens

My Sexy Kittens (0)

Denner (235) 03-15-09  08:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Exclusive content.
+ Fine Euro-models - some typical east-euro-models.
+ Crisp videos - the new videos are damn fine - and older vids are beeing updated to better quality. With succes.
+ At this date: 432 videos - but all divded in two or six files.
+ Amount of content is ok/average.
+ Fine amount of videos - compared to photosets.
+ Good mix of solo/hc-bg/lez video- and photomaterial.
+ Euro-models in new scenary - thanks - a fine plus here.
Cons: - Man, the content of this site is generally ok -
- BUT: No full scene video-files (a bummer)
- Newer files (video) are split in two, that you can live with (almost).
- But most clips are divided in 6 files - an even worse bummer.
- And NO zip for photosets (can you believe it in 2009)
- Bad preview - does not tell you anything about the content and/or style.
- Horrible navigation - you have to go through all pages - page after page to look for certain stuff - in 2009, another bummer.
- Bonus site: It's the dutch Seventeen - ok, but the bonus deal is worthless - they state "bonus, but you'll never get the real stuff here, anyway - just a tease.
Bottom Line: I'd give this site a 79 - according to the official TBP/PU-rating:
"Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend."
First of all - I've never seen most of the content here anywhere else - and this goes especially for the videos.
Some damn fine solo and bg/hc videos with exclusive content.
Models here are all/most of euro/easteuro origin - and you'll find models here that you know from elsewhere - but the videos/photosets are still exclusive.
AND here is still room for new models - models that I've not seen elsewhere - not even at the countless russian/easteuro-sites like Teenmovs/Amour Babes/18 virgin sex or whatever.
All videos in wmv: 640x480, but the average quality/viewing quality is fine/great - close to crisp.
Split video-files average: 55 mb a piece - and that you have to join - mostly - six of those files.
- And that is a bummer and not expected from a site with this kind of else fine quality videos.
But bottom line: The stuff here is fine and the content in general is exclusive - but those split video-files are a serious NUISANCE!
So My Sexy Kittens - get your act together and give us full scene download-files...
And: This is 2009 - and your site still do not have zip for the photosets....
One final cons: too many repeating log-in demands - if your're not active at the site for less than five minuttes, you got to log in - again. Bad...

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Drooler (220) Hey thanks, Denner, for this review. I'd joined this thing over three years ago. Blew some of my "Christmas money" on it! Hard to believe that I'm over 50 and Mom still sends me Christmas money. (She'd probably stop if she knew this! But she'd still send cookies.)

Anyway, I only got a short handful of galleries and the damn pics weren't even 1200px! AND I had to cherry pic each shot, being woefully ignorant then of the charms of download managers. So I said, "Screw this," and never went back. I mean, I really got fucked good. And I never did a review because it was in The Year 2 B.P.U. (the 2nd year Before Porn Users).

And still no zip files? And still that crappy navigation? (I still have fleeting memories myself of roasting synapses and a rigid wrist.)

This site must be someone's cash cow. Moo!


03-15-09  05:42pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

Hey Drooler - yes, if your mother knew about this, the cookies would stay in the jar, for sure........
And see my review as a bit of a warning to you, especially - the photo-section is not worth - ok, the latest photos are now avaliable in 2000x1333 (approx: 600 kb) - but without zip - they go for movies here and they even have zip for videograbs???? Why bother - instead of doing zip for the sets, crazy.

And: all the photofiles are just named "image" - so if you want to download each photo, you got to rename them in order not to overwrite!
I'd say this site could almost be considered hostile against photo-fans...

Still I give it a 79 - there are some very fine videos solo, bg hc and (too much) lez, - and the quality here is really fine - for the majority.

03-16-09  02:06am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

Oh, yeah, that nonsense: You have to rename the pic files yourself, so you're not only clicking, right-clicking and saving, but having to keep track of file names as you go and type each one. Jeez. I HATE that. Hey, we're porn hounds; we're not secretaries!
03-16-09  12:56pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.