Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Kim\'s Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

Khan - PU Staff 03-12-09  06:52pm
Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)


Due to the sudden and unexplainable number of new users submitting unusually high scores this past week ... at least a few shown to be shill activity, we are temporarily suspending Reviews for this site.

We'll revisit this decision after 30 days. But until then, any and all Reviews submitted for this site will be summarily declined.

We're sorry for any inconvenience this may cause but feel this action is warranted to curb the high score reviews that contain little or no substance.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (15)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


TheSquirrel (53) At last! Hooray! How about removing all the ones that have already been done?
03-12-09  07:11pm

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) I approve your decision. I was not planning on joining this site anytime in the near future, anyway.

I notice that you have a 0 score for Trust Rating. I will go boldly where no man has gone before, and give you my trust.

But to get your Trust badge, you will need many more votes.

03-12-09  07:17pm

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

As a natural subversive with an evil sense of humour I was tempted to press the "no" button. But the poor old bugger doesn't deserve it.
03-12-09  07:19pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #1 - TheSquirrel :

For now, we're going to leave them ... along with the many replies made by the regular users here. We feel this will actually serve as a better warning than giving the site a clean/blank slate.

We reserve the right to revisit this decision at a later time.

03-12-09  07:20pm

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #4 - Khan :

Sounds reasonable. I sort of guessed you and Rick must have been working on something in the background. They were really taking the piss.
03-12-09  07:23pm

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #3 - TheSquirrel :

What kind of badge does he have? When I look at his profile, I see no badges. Maybe you meant he has a club (to hit PU miscreants over the head with).

Actually, when I look at his profile, it does not show any Trust votes, not even mine.

03-12-09  07:24pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

RE: Trust Rating

haha ... funny one guys. Actually it's just a fluke that it even offers a trust rating for staffers. You'll note the badges don't show on my profile. Still, I appreciate the vote of confidence.

Oh, and TheSquirrel, just be sure to leave a reason if you cast a negative vote. BTW, you do know who typically approves the no trust ratings, right? ;) But I promise, if you cast a no trust vote and leave a reason, I'll apply the same loose standard to that as I would if you were casting it for anyone else.

03-12-09  07:25pm

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #6 - lk2fireone :

Look at the top of the page. He has a talkback badge. It's under "Khan PU Staff."
03-12-09  07:26pm

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) Ik2 - Look under the comment and your vote is there, even though it doesn't register if you ring up his profile.

Khan - Yeah I sorta figured you'd have to be the one who decides on the trust votes! You shoulda been a judge.

03-12-09  07:30pm

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #9 - TheSquirrel :

Yes, I see Talk Back badge and my Trust vote registered.

Thanks for the heads up. You have a good eye for detail.


03-12-09  07:39pm

Reply To Message


badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #4 - Khan :

I 100% agree with this. As I always say, you guys seem to get everything right around here when it comes to these decisions. I was hoping all of our work would not get deleted, there is some good stuff there.
03-12-09  08:19pm

Reply To Message


turboshaft (24) Great decision!

Hope they, or just the one person posing as multiple users, gets the message.

03-12-09  08:25pm

Reply To Message


james4096 (126) Good work there fearless leader.
I logged on today and saw 3 new reviews for this site. Hardly a coincidence.

I wonder who coordinated this flood of reviews.

03-13-09  12:31am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) "A Triumph!"

"The MUST see anal site this season!"

"The Best Porn Site of the Year!"


03-13-09  02:49pm

Reply To Message


jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #14 - Drooler :



03-14-09  07:39pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.