| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
badandy400 (103)
|
Um...This is the second extreme high score for this otherwise unheard of site this week. Makes me suspect of any one-review-wonder.
Alex. Please give us much more detail. This sounds more like an advertisement than a review.
|
03-09-09 07:42pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
turboshaft (24)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
There was a third one, by a user called Paulo, who gave it a 99, but now it's gone. It really wasn't much different from this.
|
03-09-09 08:33pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
badandy400 (103)
|
REPLY TO #2 - turboshaft :
Yes. I believe I remember that one too. Seems something a bit fishy is going on here.
|
03-09-09 09:00pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
kinkykarl (Unverified)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
Kims anal heaven is in my opinion a unique porn site for those that like not only beautiful trannies but large insertions. She is no doubt pretty and mistesrious and hot as steam when she fucks those humongous dildoes so easily. Her rose bud is adorable without a doubt. I give it a 100
KinkyKarl
|
03-09-09 11:46pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
badandy400 (103)
|
REPLY TO #2 - turboshaft :
Check the reply page. It seems we have yet another new member just raving about this site. KinkyKarl joined only a few hours ago and is continuing the advertising for them. Hell is profile does not even add up. He says he is 52, but it lists him as 49?
So by our count that is four account created to place this site up into the heavens! This makes me not trust the site either.
|
03-09-09 11:53pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
TheSquirrel (41)
|
REPLY TO #5 - badandy400 :
This is why I have awarded my first two negative trust votes to the people giving this site a ridiculusly high mark and a review containing no detail and no objectivity. I would have given a negative to the other guy, but it looks like Marshall Khan kicked his ass out of town.
|
03-10-09 05:54am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
TheSquirrel (41)
|
REPLY TO #5 - badandy400 :
Ah, it looks like the review is gone, but looks like kinkykarl
is worthy of a "no" too."
|
03-10-09 06:26am
Reply To Message
|