Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit DDF Busty

DDF Busty (0)

Active
90
ramscrota (12) 02-05-09  10:35pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well organised site. All scenes have pics & vids
-Easy navigation
-No phony tits
-Big tits not just on over-weight girls; many have average build & large tits
-HQ pics. Most sets have a choice of size
-Pic sets not too large (ie not too many pics)
-Photography: they bother to snap the moment the guy comes (sister site 1 by day tends to do it better). Too many sites ignore important nuances like this. If sites bother with pics, they should do it properly, like this one
-Range of vid size selection
-Range of scene types: solo, GG & HC - toys, anal insertions, 69, anal sex, etc
-Some variety of scene type: occasional hints of dom/sub, or Melanie D & Emily Cartright, who slop glue on each others' tits!
-Tasteful, clean decor & settings. (many sites have dingy, messy settings, or ugly decor completely devoid of any erotic feel)
-PRICE: good value & payment options
-LOGIN & PW is sensible: they let you choose your own easy to remember word Also no 'enter the code' rubbish
Cons: -Although variety of vid sizes, only lower Q vids are broken into separate clips
-Although there is variety, much of the action is cliche, formula stuff. EG phoney-looking squirming around, licking through clothing/lingerie, and rubbing & jiggling of boobs before model has removed clothing. Also annoying is single-lick oral, single-lick kissing, etc.
-Often the ladies don't undress properly befer the action starts. ACtion with knickers still on (crutch pulled aside for cock, dildo, or licking. Looks like standard, drab formula, instead of rampant lust. This kind of thing is okay every now and then, but on this site it seems to be the norm.
-TOO MUCH LOOKING AT THE CAMERA Especially the photos
-Too many scenes begin with model(s) stripped down to lingerie (more evidence of formual approach)
-silly positioning for close-ups. Happens most often in doggie, but also in missionary where guy positions himself out of line so we can see entry. An annoying tendency in porn, this.
Bottom Line: Summary
A good-value, high-quality site, easy to navigate, easy to find good models, and user friendly. The site focuses on models with large boobs, but it's not a fetish site - you get the full menu (pussy, sex, cum-shots, oral, etc). But they make good use of the large tits - eg boucing them around, self-licking, etc. The doggy sex scenes are particularly good, because these give scope for the ladies' udders to swing around like sets of wrecking balls. Usually the cum shots are over the tits, something which I find a bit limited. I prefer them to be in the mouth or face, preferably with the girl jacking the guy off.
Nevertheless, it's one of the better sites around, value-wise. The only thing that prevents it from being a top-rating site are several of
those irritating formula aspects which seem to come not from a sense of natural erotica, but the girls doing what they're told (see above in the 'cons'). If the site organizers freed themselves of much of this nonsense, this really would be a top-rating site.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

TrashMan (Disabled) Haha, you are the first person to comment about the tendency of male actors to play nice with the camera and angle themselves out of the way to show them working while preventing the female body parts from being blocked (e.g. sex from an angle, cunnilingus from an angle, etc.). I'd rather them either play male POV (put the camera at a place that a person's eyes would otherwise be...its not like I am able to see the angled view in real-life), play female POV (put the camera in a place that the female's eyes would be during the action), or play zoom-out-the-camera (I am much more interested in the facial expressions during the scene and erotic positions than seeing a guy's features up close).
02-06-09  03:37am

Reply To Message

2

ramscrota (12) REPLY TO #1 - TrashMan :

Thanks for your reply, Trashman. I tend to agree about the shot taking in the whole scene. This 'opening up the angle' to see the bits is an annoying trend in porn. It look phony and staged. I might submit a thread in the forum, and see what others think.
02-06-09  04:03am

Reply To Message

3

ace of aces (179) are the videos exclusive or are they also seen on 1byday?
09-30-09  09:06am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.