Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes (2)

Active
79
jd1961 (95) 01-01-09  08:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Hi-Res Photos
Zip Files
HD Video
NO DRM
Lot Of Models
Cons: Erotically Mild
A Chore For Collectors
Bottom Line: Finally joined this site after thinking about it for a long time. Decided to because it offers high quality, high resolution photography.

The photos are very professionally produced. And they come in 3 sizes: 600, 1200, 4000 px. They can be downloaded in zip files. The download speed is fair to good.

The vids are HD, 1280x720, very lush. They are not DRM protected.

There are 10 pages of models, many well known. All told, there are about 1400 sets. They have (to date) 382 videos. A good solid archive.

So why the low score? A couple reasons. Much of the photography is as unerotic as it comes. I will give them big credit for not having repetitious shots (ie 14 in a row of a model standing around in the same pose). But many of their sets are, well, kind of bland.

Another problem is if you are a true collector of fine nudes, it is very difficult and time consuming to use this site. For instance, when you download a set and unzip it, the folder is named "Large", or "Small", whichever size you downloaded. So you will have to rename the folder after the set. And the cover of the set is not included in the folder. Therefore you must download it separately. All very time consuming, a real drag. What is so difficult about labeling a set's folder, and including the set's cover in the folder? Makes one wonder if this is a deliberate action to force the paying customer into spending more time at the site than he would wish. Every file being labeled exactly the same? You see the problem. Downloading should be fun, and not a chore.

If you're thinking, I don't care, I just want to download some hot nekkid girls---forget it. This site isn't for you either. You'll be bored quickly.

The site has it's good points, but I don't have the time for all the chores it demands. Met-Art is much simpler to use than this site!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) It doesn't make a lot of sense, but I've found that met-art, with its huge collection of models, photosets, and videos, is easier to search and find what you're looking for than sites that have far less content.

Met-art has the basic search engine, which lets you search by model name, photographer, etc.

And it also has a complete, alphabetical listing of the models, with a thumbnail of each model beside the name, that you can browse.

Simple tools, but really effective.

One quibble is that the same model can have different names for different photosets.

01-02-09  05:35am

Reply To Message

2

Mr Fountain (50) thanks for the info; I was looking at this site but now I am glad that I passed on it. Bland is definately not what I am looking for.
01-02-09  08:34am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.