Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit VideoBox

VideoBox (6)

Active
95
TrashMan (103) 12-22-08  11:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: +Mulitple download resolutions
+High quality
+Full Scenes
+Allows users to add comments to scenes
+Allows users to rate movies
+Streaming features
+Continuous, 5 movies/day added to the site
+Movies new AND old are added
+Movies are listed with the date they are added
+Search functions work with Boolean operators
+Videos do not have site watermark in corner
+5700 DVDs!
Cons: -The mid-range resolution is 480x352, which is not standard 4:3 ratio. Why can't they encode at 480x360?
-They get a good number of actress names wrong or spelled incorrectly, or don't list them at all. And there is no good way to notify the staff to fix it.
-They post transsexual videos on the site, yet they have a separate GayVideoBox site which would be better suited for this content.
-I wish they would add some features to allow users to edit actress names or categories for scenes. VideosZ allows users to edit the tags for a scene.
Bottom Line: This site is my top site, hands down. The huge library of content, which expands each day, is enough to overcome the cons which I listed above. Eventually, VideosZ will overtake VideoBox in terms of number of DVD's offered (as they are adding a greater number of DVD's per day compared to VideoBox's five per day) but VideoBox will still be #1 in my book because of the download formats. VideoBox offers different quality WMV's, H264 and iPod along with streaming capabilities, while VideosZ offers just high quality (480x360, mind you) DivX and streaming capabilities. Also VideosZ places a "videosz.com" watermark on their videos.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to TrashMan!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.