Review Replies (1)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Denner (233)
|
I - THINK - I know what Pornomaniac means in the "Cons" -area:
"-Some videos looks a bit blurry. But I suppose the original was not better."
And that maybe is the biggest problem of the many ways great and good priced VideoBox-site: The still older and cheaper videos attached. Even if they claim some dvd-resolution, they cannot provide it.
Once the VideoBox was the overall best in its field, but the many (soon majority) of videos in bad quality is a problem.
Maybe their position as numero uno is at stake - and maybe with good reason
|
04-09-07 08:55am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
