Comment Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (218)
|
Yes, I'd been away for a whole year and signed up. Agree that the bonus sites are nothing to cheer about. Actually, I went through them a little more than once (not quite twice) and just lost interest.
By analogy, that little prize in the box of Cracker Jacks I got a few times as a kid was more satisfying. (Ouch!)
And I don't suppose they've upgraded their image sizes past the 1280 pixel barrier yet, either.
|
12-10-08 12:09pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
TrashMan (Disabled)
|
The videos I got from the site were not of impressive quality. I was rather disappointed. They are all like 400x300 in blurry quality. Its a disappointment considering that they put out DVD's of their content, all of which is in high definition widescreen for the most part.
|
12-24-08 07:00am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|