Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Pure Cherry Girls

Pure Cherry Girls (0)

Active
80
TheSquirrel (53) 11-28-08  10:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Quite attractive girls, surprisingly young and relatively inexperienced. (I said "relatively")

Great camerawork, as on most of the Pink Visual sites. This means you get to see all of the girl looking attractive rather than too many close up gynaecological shots.

No condoms.

NO DRM.

You get pictures, good ones, and lots of them.

No download limits, apart from only a limited amount of episodes being available for download.

The DVD quality is really good, although only the newer clips have that.
Cons: Excruciating navigation. Older clips are cut up into tiny pieces - sometimes 7-9 without any picture clue as to where you are in the clip.

An awful lot of talking followed by a an awful lot of oral, especially on the old clips.

Only a few clips are relesed for download each month. You have to be a member for a month then they release some more. Then you have to stay for another month to have access to the next batch.

Older clips are poor to average quality and not available for download.

The men talk too much, are occasionally irritating, and make some unpleasant comments about the girls or at least treat them a little less than respectfully.

There is the cheap and nasty trick extra site sign up box, so I deduct 5 marks for that.

If you cancel they offer you a discount, plus access to other sites. Shame they don't do that for loyal customers.
Bottom Line: I was a memeber of this site as it was a member of the Pink Visual organisation. I thought it worth doing a review as TBP have just done one.

The site used to be called "Teens For Cash."

My membership lapsed at the end of September.

The TBP review said they were no longer updating, although they were when my membership lapsed, but that was 2 months ago. There are still a lot of episodes to keep you happy.

For me what is the best thing about the site is the attractivenes of the girls (although still too many tattoos - arghhh!) and the camerawork which brings out the best of the models. The whole site gives an appearance of quality.

The older clips are more annoying because with the lousy navigation and shorter clips you can just find yourself continually streaming all the talking and more talking.

Even for the photo enthusiasts the navigation is a pain.

You get a $10 discount if you join through TBP, which is what I did.

The DVD quality on the Pink Visual sites have dimensions of 1068 by 600 with bit rates of around 5000. Below this there is the 852 by 480 dimension with bit rates of around 2500. Toadsith suggested I put in more tech, so I have tried. You tech boffins will know what that all means. Personally I think the top rate is very good, and even the rate below that is quite good.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Pinche Kankun (Disabled) If you ask me, the porn industry needs to come up with an organization that filters out repeat porn!! Reason I mention this is because why would I pay for something that I have already seen a thousand times? =/

Look, I don't know if anybody realizes it, but when you go to a website that has clips from another website, don't you think that clip stealing website should be investigated?!!!

11-28-08  10:26am

Reply To Message

2

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #1 - Pinche Kankun :

Hmm - if it's genuine clip stealing then yes. But quite often what happens is that sites sell their clips to other sites. For instance you can see a number of Pink Visual clips on Video Box. I haven't seen that many Pink Visual clips elsewhere though.

Mind you as someone who loves Pirate Bay and supports some of the anti copyright organisations and also the ones who support free speech on the internet, there is a whole lot of discussion and opinions to be found on this. There are a lot of grey areas around now due to the internet, that were not around before.

11-28-08  10:40am

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) Squirrel, you write a nice, detailed review.
Lots of good details to give an overall impression of the site.
Also, you add a bit of class to the PU membership, with your English way of talking. I always admired/respected the English accent/words you Brits talk with.
I'm not a tech boffin, but I too will try to throw in some tech numbers, just to make other members happier with my reviews.

11-28-08  10:54am

Reply To Message

4

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

Cheers! You ask questions, which I like. So I find you a welcome adition to the site as well.
11-28-08  11:02am

Reply To Message

5

Pinche Kankun (Disabled) REPLY TO #2 - TheSquirrel :

That's nice to know. You know, that's basically why I kinda stick to homemade amateur never-seen-before porn cause if I didn't request to see the same clip over and over again, it won't happen!!
11-28-08  11:04am

Reply To Message

6

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #5 - Pinche Kankun :

Yes I agree with the amateur homemade porn thing being a bit different. I quite like that, as well as the glossy sort that organisations like Pink Visual do. If you go to Video Box, so much of it looks like it's produced by the same company. Only occasionally does something really impress. On the other hand there's tons of well made run of the mill stuff which 30 years ago would have cost $100, just for one video!
11-28-08  11:10am

Reply To Message

7

TheRizzo (23) REPLY TO #2 - TheSquirrel :

Yeah I never feel right about visiting the many tube sites out there these days as it seems like a lot of the content is ripped right from the members areas. I just feel wrong about it for some reason. But I have in the past used limewire etc.

No question its become a grey area with the internet making things to get so easy for free but I do worry that one day a lot of the things I love will cease to be around cause its no longer financialy viable for the producers to make.

I think the case with Video Box is exactly right, a lot of sites sell their clips or buy them non exclusive from the photographers.

11-28-08  09:00pm

Reply To Message

8

Pinche Kankun (Disabled) REPLY TO #6 - TheSquirrel :

AIGHT YEAH!!
11-28-08  11:20pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.09 seconds.