| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
mbaya (354)
|
Are there any uncensored videos? I hate those mosaics and would never subscribe to a site where every video had them.
|
11-26-08 09:02am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Toadsith (48)
|
REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :
The preview pages show 164 uncensored movies.
|
11-26-08 09:27am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Toadsith (48)
|
Wow! That is a seriously positive review, I'll have to check this site out :-) What size are the high res photos? I'm probably about as interested in the photos as I am the video.
|
11-26-08 09:27am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
messmer (137)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Toadsith :
I agree about the good review but 164 uncensored videos out of 1000 doesn't sound that great to me. I hate those pictures and movies where all the good bits are blurred and pixelated.
|
11-26-08 02:22pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Lionheart (47)
|
You gave this site really high praise, site looks really great I'll check it out sometime in the future, thanks for sharing the info!
|
11-26-08 03:34pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
jd1961 (95)
|
REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :
Yes, there are about 160 movies without the mosaic.
|
11-26-08 09:38pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
jd1961 (95)
|
REPLY TO #4 - messmer :
I thought I made it clear in my review that this is a premium Japanese site. Most uncensored Japanese video is of lesser actresses and no JAV stars, and illegal in Japan.The notable exception being Maria Ozawa who rebelled against the JAV system!
So my review reflects that. I know a lot of people don't understand the JAV industry. There is no uncensored JAV video. There are plenty of 3rd rate genital video sites to go to, but they won't include JAV stars.
|
11-26-08 09:45pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
jd1961 (95)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Toadsith :
Generally 1280px, but I'm seeing newer sets at 1537.
|
11-26-08 09:49pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
jd1961 (95)
|
REPLY TO #4 - messmer :
I want to add one thing here about JAV, and I'm not going to get into an argument over it like I did in a previous review, or even pass judgement.
As an old timer, IMO there are 2 types of adult material:
Erotica and porno.
Porno focuses on the genitals, and speaking only for myself, while not against seeing that at all, that to me is not too important. Porno focuses on the old in and out, and specializes in endless closeups of body parts. Fine. And if you never saw porn before, that's what you want to see I guess.
Erotica is the overall mood or setting. I am an old timer, and I want to see beautiful girls, such as the JAV girls. Would I rather see the mosaic removed, sure, and it probably will be some day. But I'm more interested in the eroticism as opposed to the porn. And this is the way it is with premium Japanese porn. If the JAV stars were allowed to do both styles, I'd watch the uncensored---but they don't. IMO, mine only, uncensored japanese porn is mostly junk. The top shelf girls don't do it (Maria Ozawa excepted).And I don't watch it just for the genitals.
The JAV industry is so huge that I'm sure one day the mosaic will be removed, it's pretty paper thin now as it is.
|
11-26-08 09:58pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Denner (233)
|
jd1961 sure is our specialist in japanese erotica - and as jd states it's not just porn.
Agree - in the beginning when I first tried to get into the censored movies, I also found it a bit strange with the blurred stuff (mosaic).
But if you focus on the girl/model and not mainly genitals, it's great in another way. And here you also find some of the most beautifull girls - I really dig those "dancer-videos"
BTW, jd - great review, thanks!
|
11-27-08 02:19am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
messmer (137)
|
REPLY TO #7 - jd1961 :
Thanks for clarifying things for me, jd. I've never subscribed to a Japanese site or even visited one. I got my low opinion of pixelation from downloading (and rejecting) a few short clips found in other places.
|
11-27-08 12:54pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
messmer (137)
|
REPLY TO #9 - jd1961 :
Huh! I got you beat when it comes to being an old-timer, jd. :-) And I'm with you when it comes to appreciating and yearning for more eroticism in porn and less preoccupation with the sex act itself.
However, censorship in all its forms bothers me and causes a gut reaction against the material shown. However, when in Japan .... ! :-)
|
11-27-08 01:01pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
Toadsith (48)
|
REPLY TO #8 - jd1961 :
Respectable, but not massive - thanks for the info! :-)
|
11-27-08 10:48pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
jd1961 (95)
|
REPLY TO #12 - messmer :
Yes, that's what I'm talking about! Japan will be Japan.
|
11-28-08 05:07am
Reply To Message
|
15
|
jd1961 (95)
|
REPLY TO #13 - Toadsith :
I know what you mean. There aren't a whole lot of "huge" Japanese photos yet for some reason, Vanilla H comes to mind.
|
11-28-08 05:09am
Reply To Message
|
16
|
jd1961 (95)
|
REPLY TO #10 - Denner :
Thanks Denner,
I found it difficult to get used to it at first also, but the mosaic is thin now, it used to cover a large area, now it is in oputline shape. One of these days...
|
11-28-08 05:10am
Reply To Message
|
17
|
Denner (233)
|
REPLY TO #16 - jd1961 :
I maybe said it before, but I'll say it again:
Great that you're back here at PU - at lot of newcommers - and of course oldtimers - can really benefit from your inputs, reviews ect.....
BTW: That anonymous no-trust of 06-26-08 is absolutely nonsens. Khan, get rid of it, please!
|
11-28-08 05:27am
Reply To Message
|
18
|
jd1961 (95)
|
REPLY TO #17 - Denner :
Thanks Denner,
I took a bit of a break from porn, but I did miss PU!
|
11-28-08 05:30am
Reply To Message
|
19
|
lk2fireone (194)
|
Sex Asian 18 definitely worth a look. Great review, and great find.
Wish I had the time and money to look at these great sites.
My take on erotic:
Eroticism is a state of mind. Sure, there's a large physical element, but if the mind is not engaged, the body won't react on its own. Erotic versus porn? That's mainly a distinction in the mind as well. Personal tastes, don't you know. Playboy back in the 1960s and 1970s fought a lot of legal battles because the magazine was classified as porn. The magazine is still considered porn by many people. How many people at PU would consider Playboy as porn? My guess is few to none, they would consider Playboy as softcore erotic, if they had to classify it. Or more likely, as softcore dull.
|
11-28-08 06:36am
Reply To Message
|
20
|
TheRizzo (23)
|
REPLY TO #7 - jd1961 :
Very strong review, I may have to give it a look. 97 is a very high score!
|
11-28-08 09:02pm
Reply To Message
|
