Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit DDF Beauties

DDF Beauties (0)

Active
70
Drooler (220) 11-08-08  01:55am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (83), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +That DDF image and video quality, as always
+Collection updated daily since the faux start date of January 1st, 2008. (TBP lists the launch date as “Oct. 2008, approx.”)
+Niche links to b/g hardcore (33 sets), lesbian (64 sets), or toys content. “Beautiful Babes” is semi-redundant as it includes lesbian.
+Monthly calendar layout is simpler and more straightforward than 1byday’s
+3 image size choices: 800, 1200, or 2000 pixels
+Image viewing a bit better than at 1byday: You can click the three size choices under each thumb instead of in the image popup window.
+Videos in 1280x720 (wmv and divX), 852x480 (wmv), 960x540 (QT), and 720x405 (Flash stream). Also available are 448x256 mpg segments.
+Fast downloads: 2-3 Mbps on vids; galleries in a few seconds
+”Babe Finder” may help those who, for example, prefer blonds with medium-sized tits doing hardcore
+Visitors can buy only the sets they want for $2.50 each, though a one-month membership is obviously a better deal
Cons: -Very little that’s new to DDF. If you’ve been a member of 1byday, you’ve seen most of this already. This is the biggest minus for sure.
-Limited navigation. Can’t browse galleries with thumbs all on one page; can’t jump ahead to final or other page. Makes for tedious browsing by model. (Must click “Model List” then the first initial then the model’s thumb to return to her.)
-Zip downloads of one size: 2000px. (Could be worse.)
-From the niche links, you get thumbs not with the model names, but instead with the vanilla-flavored titles such as “Sapphic Fornication,” “Sapphic Obligation,” and “Sapphic Recreation.”
-Thumbnail images of only the girl sometimes which, if you’re browsing from the calendars or the model list, don’t indicate that the gallery/video content is actually lesbian or hardcore. The titles don’t always help, either.
-“Coming Soon” might as well be called “Coming Next.” That’s all it is.
-Cancellation not set up for this site. Had to request by ticket.
Bottom Line: I don’t get it. Why are they offering this site? It’s basically just a smaller-sized clone of 1byday, albeit at a more affordable price.

Still, I’d think it would have made more sense to offer something they haven’t done before: Spanking new content of beautiful women without the hardcore, lesbian or toy activities. (I didn’t mean that there should be spanking in it.)

Another alternative would have been to offer their “reloaded” content all on one site. There’s still a big backlog of that. And that way those who wanted it could get it (I would), while those who didn’t wouldn’t be dissatisfied -- as I know some PornUsers have been with 1byday.

At least the design here is cleaner, clearer, less confusing, and frankly more attractive than 1byday, which takes a little getting used to.

Yet I would only recommend this site to a PornUser who has never joined 1byday and probably never will. At $24.95, it would be a good deal.

For them, the review score would be 90. For the DDF-experienced, it would be a 50 because it offers practically nothing that is new. So to be fair, 90-50 = 40. 40/2 = 20. 20+50 = 70.

Finally, when I tried to cancel, which you can only do through the site, I went through a maze of pages only to find that it wouldn't work because they lead to the cancellation page of a different site! So I had to create a "ticket" to send to support. Fortunately, cancellation was completed within 24 hours.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Denner (233) Another fine review from Drooler - and somewhat of a good "warning".
It's maybe not strange that DDF keeps comming up with new niche sites - they are also in it for the money.

But for the sake of the users I think they are a bit too smart. Every new site I've seen from DDF has content where an overwhelming amount is taken from other sites and, yes as Drooler points out: If you have been a member of the motherload: 1byday, you have seen most of it before.
I'll suggest that users who are not familiar with the DDF productions start up with 1byday.

11-08-08  02:28am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Starting with 1by is a good idea since it's got lots of bang for the buck. And yes, maybe the folks at DDF have gotten a little too smart, or just wild (?), offering up the same chili and beans in a different can. After all, don't they realize that they'll get called on it?

But I'm not blaming them for my disappointment. I could've just left it alone. Instead I took the risk of joining, hoping against hope that really fresh content would be served up. But ... noooooooo!

I'm going to have to swear this stuff off for a while, wallow in some guilt ... and then come back bushy tailed. ;)

11-08-08  05:05am

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Well, it's always easy with hindsight (is that the right word?).
Anyway I think that could be my case here - like some kind of thought that exactly DDF's new sites are a matter of known content.
I've run through every new thing they come up with - trying to scan the content - which sometimes are NOT that easy. But when succeding, yes: I've seen that, and that and that before....
Sure, you could have left them alone, but then again they are good at promoting new sites and wet your appetite.

But as you state: They must realize, that they'll get called on it...

11-08-08  06:55am

Reply To Message

4

Wittyguy (95) I have to admit, yours is the most original mathematical scoring system on a review that I've seen so far. Thanks for the heads up on this; I sort of figured it didn't have much new to offer.
11-20-08  10:06pm

Reply To Message

5

lk2fireone (194) Your review score for DDF Beauties is amazing.

I've been having problems coming up with a sensible scoring method for a site. But after examining your mathematical model, I realized you deserve a "Professor of Scoring" badge.

If there is no such badge, Pornusers should give it to you anyway.

11-21-08  09:06am

Reply To Message

6

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :

I still remember my math teachers saying, "Show your work!" But it's basically going to be something between 70 and 75, all other things being pretty good. Seems to apply to best, for my purposes anyway, to sites that just repackage old content (like the one under review here) or that obsess about toy play at the general expense of other things. My review of Teenrotica is like that.
11-21-08  04:42pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.