Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit VideoBox

VideoBox (8)

Active
70
oldfart (7) 10-20-08  10:39pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: vast amount of content
updates 5 times daily with new videos
low membership price for quantity of videos
has good download options for capturing specific scenes
download speeds are good
no download limit
video quality is very good for videos actually shot with high def equipment
Cons: content is average
much of content is poorly lit
video added dates do not reflect the actual date of the material
Bottom Line: The enormous amount of content, and the low membership cost, are probably the main reasons most reviewers have liked this site. However, much of the content appears to come from smaller producers, and is old, which is why they can likely keep their membership prices low.

If you are young and somewhat new to porn, it is a great bargain. If you are an old fart, like me, you will not be too impressed. I have just reviewed only the last month of "new" videos and have seen actors in them that were popular 10-15 years ago.

Therefore, older videos shot with tape will look no better when they are digitized, and this may be the reason why so many appear to be poorly lit, to cover up what is just not there.

Despite these major flaws in many of the videos, you are liable to find something worth downloading from this site, based on the shear number of videos available, and the 150 that would be added during a one month membership.

In sum, this site is worth a one month trial, if you have a fast connection, and lots of unused hard drive space. However, you will also need lots of time to sift through the content to find something worth downloading.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Cybertoad (100) why the low review Oldfarts.
I see you put
content is average
much of content is poorly lit
video added dates do not reflect the actual date of the material.

Only as cons ?

Thanks

10-21-08  08:36am

Reply To Message

2

oldfart (7) REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :

Yes, these are the main cons. Personally, I had to sift through quite a number of videos to find downloads that appealed to me. I found about 30 clips from 18 of 200 videos that I thought were interesting between Oct 20 and Sept 11, 2008. You may find more to your liking I am only expressing my opinion. There is a lot of content on this site, despite its quality of content flaws, so in the end it is worth a trial for those who are satisfied with ordinary porn.
10-21-08  12:46pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.