Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Amateurs Gone Bad

Amateurs Gone Bad (0)

Denner (235) 08-26-08  03:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Tremendous amount of videos and photosets
Video-quality is still getting better (new ones, of course)
Easy navigation
Access to four more sites, mainly Glamour Models Gone Bad and the great Crissy Moran.
Daily updates for the two main sites AGB and GMGB.
Good mix of both US and Euro models
Zip for photosets
Stream for those who dig that
Cons: Very slow updates for some bonus-sites like Crissy Moran and Lonnie Waters.
Early videos in poor quality
Only wmv-downloads
Too many models without video
Irregular download speed
Most content non-exclusive
Bottom Line: This is a site that has grown over the years - both in quantity (of course), and in quality.
It's part of a "network" where you get five sites - no matter which you join.
Top pick here is of course Amateurs Gone Bad and Glamour Models Gone Bad.
In the package you also get Crissy Morans official-site (it's called that, anyway), Lonnie Waters and Natalia Cruz.
Joined because of Crissy - here are some tremendous newer videos (most in full files) both solo and hardcore. Those videos are a tresure for Crissy-fans. Crisp quality - between 90 and 270 Mb. Only WMV.
Lonnie has few videos - bad quality.
Natalia Crus: average video quality.
The two main-sites delivers a magnificent amount of material - both videos og photosets. Video-files mostly between 80 and 200 Mb - and again the later are in best quality - early ones just poor.
Photosets today mostly 1500x1000 and with zip.
A bit strange difference in models at Glamour and Amateur:
Amateur has a lot of european models - both video and photosets - whereas the main part of videos at Glamour are US-models, but a lot of euro models for the photosets.
A somewhat 50/50 deal on hc and sologirl.
Fine preview inside: videos in smaller part (and full) or stream in smaller part and full.
This site/sites have been around for a long time and today it has both a lot of content - though most is non-exclusive - and far better quality.
If your're a serious pornbrowser these sites has a lot to offer in hours and hours of videos of both hc, lez and especially solo-girl nature...
It's recommended...

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.

  Be the first to reply to Denner!

  Reply To Review

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.