Fucked And Bound (1)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||-Discounted price through TBP.
-Underrepresented niche of male dom/female sub BDSM with sex.
-Nice size site with 100 videos and an equal number of screenshot photo sets.
-Nice ethnic mix of White models, as well as Latinas, Asians and Black women.
-Some are pornstars, some are BDSM lifestyle amateurs who don't make other videos and are exclusive to the site.
-Works with download managers. Fast downloads.
-No DRM or broken links. No download limits.
-All exclusive material.
||-Site may not be updating. No schedule listed, no mention of upcoming new material and updates do not include dates. Further, TBP has 139 videos in June and now there are only 100. Some archived videos I still have from my membership three years ago are no longer on the site.
-Can download only individual clips or all clips as a zipdownload file. If you do that, you also get 6 poor quality 320x240 jpeg screenshots- not even interesting shots. Since I also deleted the before and after interviews, I deleted at least 8 files for each download. Very tedious and you still have only clips, not a full video.
-Somewhat grainy videos at 640x480 1000 kbps. Not adequate.
||In the real world of BDSM as a lifestyle, the most common combination is male dom/female sub. In contrast, in the world of porn you more often see sites with females as dom and either males or other females as sub.
Many, if not most, BDSM sites do not include sex. Of those that do, they mostly portray females as doms. This site is one of only a few that try to strike a balance of hot sex with a male dom BDSM theme.
A strong competitor is the network of similar sites, kink.com. In particular, sexandsubmission.com is fairly similar.
The balance of sex and BDSM is different. SNS focuses on power transfer with a subtheme of sexual submission. What I mean here is that the women are portrayed as willing victims that enjoy being helpless as they are used for sex. The focus is to a large degree on oral sex being used, althogh there is also anal and vaginal. The props used are more creative than just using ropes. For example, they may be put in a box with their heads sticking out, or have their heads put through a hole in a wall. Generally, these women cannot move. Also, many scenes are outdoors or in any one of several locations.
In contrast, FNB focuses much more on the punishment aspects of BDSM. Anal is the most common sex here and it is primarily used to teach lessons to the girls for not obeying the Master. Although there is also vaginal and oral, these are not the most common focus. The girls are mostly, if not in all scenes, simply tied with ropes in a fixed position. While SNS portrays women as sex victims, FNB sees them as deserving of punishment for their "transgressions". There is no variety of locations and some videos have poor lighting.
The two sites have many similarities though. There is a lot of overlap, as both sites use many of the same male and female actors. Both sites stick to a theme of controlled consensual action. Both sites show before and after interviews to let you see that the females are not being forced or coerced. Both sites use safewords and conform to a self imposed code of conduct as to what is permissable. There is no overt demeaning verbal or physical degradation, no blood, no fisting, peeing, etc.
Overall the site is interesting if you like this kind of thing. However, if you are not sure, join sexandsubmission. Besides the quality of the content, the HD video quality at SNS makes this site seem to be in the Dark Ages.
Reply To Review