Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Paul Markham Teens

Paul Markham Teens (0)

Newbie
80*
dredog (2) 07-22-08  10:55am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of the most beautiful natural-looking girls on the internet. Nicely shot. Large selection of material. Large amount of content.
Cons: Video and picture quality not very good. More search options would be nice (i.e.; hair color, toy type, skin tone, foot fetish, etc.)
Bottom Line: Paul Markham has hands-down some of the cutest girls on the net. If the picture and video quality were upgraded to today's highest standard, I would probably be a life-long member. I would like to see picture quality and size in the 4k range and HD video with avi and wmv options. Overall this is a great site that could use some upgrading as far as quality and navigation/search features. If you like some of the most natural-looking beautiful teens on the net in a variety of content types and do not place a high value on video and picture quality, this may be your site. Would like to see the quality up there with sites like ALScans or SaphicErotica, etc.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

paulmarkham (15)
Webmaster
Good points and taken in. I'm now getting all the new videos and pictures scanned to bigger sizes. Am thinking of giving a FLV version that will cover all needs. They will be for all. The two sites you listed don't have 1000 videos, easier to do with 500. I am increasing the number of videos on the site though.

Going back and editing the masters again?

Big job and needs planning. I'm thinking about it, more videos or bigger videos?

07-22-08  12:20pm

Reply To Message

2

badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #1 - paulmarkham :

I would prefer not to use FLV. Not exactly my favorite file type. Any more you have to have good clarity in videos and picture. As a user that is a high priority when looking at a site that covers a common niche. If you had a more obscure niche then you could get away with lower quality, but that is not the case here. Quality sells!
07-22-08  02:20pm

Reply To Message

3

paulmarkham (15)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #2 - badandy400 :

Will be looking at getting better quality in the future. Got the new site coming up and that's the priority. Yes quality sells.
07-22-08  02:39pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.