Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Babe Centerfolds

Babe Centerfolds (0)

Drooler (220) 06-14-08  06:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Exclusive content
+Quite a few hot babes
+Some of the newer photography is really good: Justine Joli, Michelle Maylene, Nika Noire, Rebecca Linares (though some of it is on her site, too), and Leah Wilde are hot.
+Some galleries have MANY photos (but there are those excessively repeated poses)
+Two subsites included: “Club Sabrina Rose” and “One Time Babes” (this one, mostly videos, is VERY disorganized, though)
+No DRM on the videos
Cons: -“We guarantee daily high quality super sexy updates,” they say. Nonsense. 6/13, 6/11, 6/06, 6/4, 5/30, 5/28, 5/23, 5/21, 5/16, 5/14, 5/12, 5/09 ... so much for that.
-“(Including Extremely Large PHOTOS compressed in ZIP files available for download),” they say. Phooey, I say. Most newer photos are 1200px. Found only TWO galleries of the “extremely large” (3072px).
-NO ZIPS of ANY photos except for the 2 "extremely large"
-Slideshow feature doesn’t work
-Lists only the last 12 updates. To find the other dates, click on model, then on gallery; the date is under each thumbnail.
-Disorganized! Justine Joli "Fashion 1" gallery pics labeled "Fashion 2" is but one example.
-Some content is really old and looks it; 1024’s, and lower. Example: Jana Cova “Dress Up” from 2003 is 800px.
-Slow video downloads (330Kbps; ISP max is 20Mbps)
-Nominal video sizes can be misleading: Mariah Nelson “Back Alley Noir” 720x480 is actually smaller but matted in those dimensions.
Bottom Line: This is one of those sites that you like for having exclusive content, but you keep wishing it was in better hands. Pics that are too small, no zips (well, almost), amateurish design, and webmaster incompetence all make it feel like a wasted opportunity. Really, the web design is a joke. You can look at the site and see how it could be to set up in a user-friendly way instead of the sorry state that it’s actually in. Frankly, I’m amazed.

Why not have separate sections for models, photos, and videos, each with their dates posted THERE, for all of the content? This site is organized just by models (these models on page one, these on page two, etc.). And sometimes in a model page you get a video image, but click deeper and there are also photos.

The header on each gallery page of photos takes up so much vertical space that you have to scroll down to see the photo. Go to next photo, repeat ...

You’d almost think the objective was to make this site non- ... no, make that, counter- ... no, ANTI-intuitive and just plain difficult.

Low score, and well deserved, especially for 1. the statement “(Including Extremely Large PHOTOS ...,” which gives the misleading impression that much of the site has such photos, and 2. their “guarantee” of daily updates.

And actually, some content that it used to have is missing! Where are the Madison Doll, Meriah Nelson, and Rebecca Lord photosets? (Have been a member twice before, Dec. ’05 and Nov. ’06.)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Like some newspaperfolks talk about: News you can use!
This is a review you can use.....preview looks fine and I could easyly be tempted.
But I'll save my money on this one.
Thanks, Drooler!

06-15-08  07:41am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Hey, Denner,
I just checked again, hoping against hope that they might be backdating some of those "hi rez" zip-only files, especially for Justine Joli, but no.

Sometimes I think I'm just fated to find sites that aren't that hot, but not completely bad either, and write reviews of them, especially these days.

Thanks again!

06-20-08  08:08pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Man, I know that feeling!!!!!!:

"Sometimes I think I'm just fated to find sites that aren't that hot, but not completely bad either, and write reviews of them, especially these days."

But here and BTW: Clicked at the Justine Joli link.
THAT looks like something different and quite attractive concerning the video-preview.

And, Drooler: let's face it. It's getting more and more difficult to find that - or those - special site(s) that ONCE AGAIN will make the world rattle and shake - porn-wise.
But I think that we both will keep on looking, 'cause this is somewhat the name of the game....

Good to hear from you again, bro.....
Another BTW: Have you by any chance been back at this one site you once (a long time ago) recommended: Top Miss (the french thing)?
I just did not dare to try it - only reason is that I could not find a way to cancel rebill (Any time I join, I always look for a way out - if it's not CCBill or the new Epoch....

06-21-08  06:39am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #3 - Denner :

I lurk around the visitor's area of TopMiss at least once a week. These days they're doing these small partial galleries older VivThomas content. But if they're doing them at 3000px, that's good! They just added the one of Mia Stone's bicycle excursion, which I know from my VivThomas collection leads to a very nice picnic al fresco on the green grass.

I never had trouble cancelling the two times I'd been a member. Sometimes I'd have to look up a French term or two to figure things out. But it was pretty much pas de problème.

They really ought to get back into the dollar market sometime again as well as the Euro.

06-21-08  08:57am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.