Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Real Wife Stories

Real Wife Stories (0)

Toadsith (48) 05-28-08  09:07pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Unique plots for each scene, varied wardrobe choices for models, and good enough acting during plot setup for easy acceptance of fantasy
* Well lit, organized sets, good camera work, good sound
* Many video formats - 640x480 at +1MB/s in WMV, MP4, MPG and iPod/PSP ready MP4
* Screenshots and Video Trailers for all scenes
* Matching 600x900 photo sets for all scenes (500 to 1000 photos each)
* Flash streaming video w/ full screen option
* Network wide advanced search, category search/browse, model search/browse, random scene button
* Weekly updates
* Fast downloads (1.16 MB/s), download accelerator friendly
* User comments, ratings, favorites, forum
* Full access to Brazzers Network (19 other sites) and 40 bonus sites with streaming content
Cons: * Small site (only 19 scenes)
* Most models fit the classic porn star look (84% silicon implants and 44% blondes), not much variation
* No high definition video
* No high resolution photos
* Small, opaque watermark in right corner of videos (transparent on photos)
* Category listings have varied accuracy (they do not always include all the scenes they should)
Bottom Line: Real Wife Stories focuses on sexual fantasies revolving around married women in extramarital relations. The models have the porn star look; happily, the wardrobes arenít all porn star stock & trade and the site matches the set to the story and has everyone at least adlib lines that make sense.

Good camera work & lighting so everything is easy to see. The models are at ease and adopt their characters while showing off their talents Ė though overacting is the norm. Nothing here is subtle but the scene setup means it doesnít need to be. You get different positions with oral sex to start (often for both parties) and the finale is external but the target varies, not just facials.

On the technical side, videos & photos are a bit small for a wealthy network (640x480 | 600x900) but the content is crisp Ė though in high motion scenes some dithering is visible. Many preview options (trailers, screenshots, matched photo sets) gives a very thorough feel for a scene prior to download.

The site is too small to stand on its own (19 scenes) but since they have already established a tangible theme and done it well it indicates that the site will continue to grow and thrive. As a member of the Brazzers Network itís a part of tons of content thatís all categorized & searchable. User interaction is great with everything from ratings to a forum at their disposal. Despite its technical limitations, the siteís character and the included network make it nothing short of excellent.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


roseman (253) Helpful review,
according to one of your cons: '' Most models fit the classic porn star look (84% silicon implants and 44% blondes), not much variation '' I am a bit confused honestly.
Statistics is a very useful science but I never seen a connection with porn.
How did you count that 84% of site's models implants are silicon?

09-19-08  09:51pm

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #1 - roseman :

Good point. The implants aren't necessarily silicon; I got a bit overly specific - some could be Saline or perhaps something all together more alien. I did go through the models and count exactly how many of them were specified as natural - thereby getting the 84% figure. I just wanted the readers to realize that you are getting a lot of bottle blondes and a lot of surgically augmented bodies.

While I love the enthusiasm present in models from American mainstream porn - I personally don't like severely altered physiques that chase the Barbie ideal. I don't mind tattoos or piercings (sometimes they are awesome) - but enhanced breasts, noses, chins, et cetera - can make for some unnerving results and almost always diminish the model's beauty in my eyes. I think Jeremy Clarkson said it very well in last season's Top Gear:

"Mind you as Francis Bacon once said 'There is no beauty that hath not some strangeness about its proportions'. And he's right, whoever he is. I'm mean, look at Keira Knightley: She's just an ironing board with a face, and she works."

09-19-08  10:27pm

Reply To Message


roseman (253) REPLY TO #2 - Toadsith :

hahahahaha, I got your point.
But BTW I don't think that Brazzers seperate models as natural or as fake '' implants '' (as you named it).

09-20-08  01:05am

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #3 - roseman :

Unfortunately I no longer have an active membership with them - so I can't check to be 100% sure, but if memory serves, in their big ass list of random categories they had a natural or real or something like that category. Now whether or not models were correctly placed in it, that is an entirely different matter. I know they weren't exactly consistent on other categories :-P
09-20-08  01:36am

Reply To Message


roseman (253) REPLY TO #4 - Toadsith :

One sure thing is that Brazzers Network definitely need new blood and more natural breasts models.
09-20-08  01:44am

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #5 - roseman :

No arguments there, lol

The real question, is why am I still up at 5 in the morning?

09-20-08  01:51am

Reply To Message


roseman (253) REPLY TO #6 - Toadsith :

lol, dunno about you, but I am downloading few files from upskirttimes.com and upskirtmania.org, will add a review soon of those two as soon as I find some free time.
09-20-08  01:53am

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #7 - roseman :

Haha, snazzy - I love the newspaper font.
09-20-08  02:00am

Reply To Message


roseman (253) REPLY TO #8 - Toadsith :

;-) content is very interesting.
09-20-08  02:45am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.