Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Shay Laren

Shay Laren (0)

plan b (15) 05-26-08  03:07pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Reasonably fast DL speeds for a solo model site, I regularly got 300-400KB/sec
- Zipped picture sets
- Visual quality of newer images & videos are outstanding
- Membership includes access to 6 different sites (4 are mostly dead, 2 are updated very regularly)
Cons: - Still really light on content
- Updates are sparse for a site that really needs to build up a content library
- No preview of next update or any idea when it comes
- Naming convention of image/video files make no sense and follow no discernible pattern
Bottom Line: Make sure you're a Shay Laren fan if you sign up for this. It was worth the price of admission for a month, but even the bonus sites aren't enough to keep my membership going.

There've been 4 updates in the last month, 2 videos and 2 photo sets. There's no posted schedule for updates and no preview to what might be coming up next. But at least you know that it's Shay, which is enough for me.

There are 94 photo sets and 22 videos. Photos range from 1000px on the low side to 2000px on the high end, though the high res sets are rare. Video quality is a low bitrate 640x480 for the older files to 1280x720 HD for newer ones. (The last 2 videos posted were only 640x480 though.) File sizes average 200-300KB for images. Videos range from ~46MB to a whopping 520MB though most are 100MB or less. Running time ranges but most seem to fall around 5-10 minutes.

4 of the bonus sites are pretty dead. The other 2 (GlamourModelsGoneBad.com and AmateursGoneBad.com) get updates daily. There's a huge amount of variety on these two sites. Some of the pictures & videos I've seen before so the content is probably licensed.

I'd rate this on the lower end of the "recommended" scale as long as you're a Shay fan. If you're not, you're probably better off moving on.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


atrapat (112) Excellent and accurate review. Keep up the good work.

I was member to another site in the network about a month ago and several of the most recent photo updates at that site were merely individual frames from HD videos (blurry, horizontal, 1280x720). I found that very sleazy. Is it happening at Shay Laren on the most recent sets too?

I could access Shay Laren and downloaded most of the zip files and I've only found one (Peach Lingerie) where they did this but I was wondering if they have also done it in the last couple of sets.

05-31-08  11:04am

Reply To Message


plan b (15) REPLY TO #1 - atrapat :

The last few sets posted are definitely not screen captures. But I'd say they're not all that consistent either. The last two are fair resolution (1600px - 1700px), but one came from Matt's Models. The one before these two was kind of low for today's technology (1024px). I honestly think I could take better pictures with my own amateurish photography skills. IMHO, still worth it for a Shay Laren fan if you're the type to sign up, drain and then cancel.
06-12-08  02:03pm

Reply To Message


atrapat (112) REPLY TO #2 - plan b :

Thanks for the info. I was rather disappointed with so many screen captures in that network but it's good to know that it was temporary.

I agree the site is a must for Shay Laren fans. I only grabbed the zip files but there are some very good pictures in them. I wish she didn't have that tattoo in her back, though.

06-12-08  02:31pm

Reply To Message


apoctom (145) Thanks for the review. I'm a Shay fan, but I don't think that I can justify $30 for the photo collection that you reviewed. I appreciate the review.
08-08-08  07:21am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.