Silent Views (0)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||+professionally designed site
+professional quality photography
+easy navigation with a variety of good features
+voting on photosets
+photoset thumbs are a good size
+zips of photos in two sizes: 1200x1800 and 2000x3000
||-currently updating only on Tuesdays and Fridays, but has sometimes been 3x per week (e.g., Nov. 2007)
-large photos only from zips
-slideshows pre-set at 10-second intervals that user cannot adjust
-only 47 models
-about 20% of the models are definitely NOT good looking (conservative figure): too old, too homely and/or too “butch.”
-photos are too often in a dark background
-photosets lack inspiration, at least from the subscriber’s point of view
-photosets sometimes brief at 30-40 pics
-no videos (sorry, video fans)
||This is a nude photography site, pure and simple. There are 168 photosets to date.
I’d been “visiting” for a few months and my curiosity finally got the best of me. (Kick self again.)
One of the really attractive women here is Denisa (known as “Deni” at 1byday). There are 6 photosets of her to date, but even those serve to exemplify the studied blandness that prevails at this site: “Classic Nylons” (64 pics, 4 positions); “Old Cabinet” (69 pics, 4 positions); “Classic Seat” (80 pics, 3 positions); “On Blue” (56 pics, just facing and partly turning).
In some sets, the girls don’t even completely disrobe. “Dream” with Veronica Vanoza is just the first, not-completely-nude part of “Violet” (nude; just standing, sitting, and squatting).
In other words: repetitive and uninteresting. Again and again. The feeling of some sets being too brief would vanish if they had more spark and variety.
Technically, the site is very good. In terms of model presentation, though, it could be lot better.
It’s boring. Skip it.
Reply To Review