Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Paul Markham Teens

Paul Markham Teens (0)

Active
90
Douggie (8) 03-01-07  09:17pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Awsome site. Nice looking young amatures. great niches (well what Im looking for anyway). As I have stated in all my reviews this is for video only...I never look at pictures.
Paul has a forum that enables you to talk directly with him. He listens to what you have to say that can improve his site.
Cons: Updates are normally videos of models recirculated through.
Bottom Line: Good site. Good owner. Quite a few models. Some Im sure you have seen and remebered from other places.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

paulmarkham (15)
Webmaster
Thanks Douggie.
Yes I'm usually around during the day and a message on the forum will catch me, unless I'm in the studio.

Yes we recirculate and I know this will upset people who have been members for longer than 3 months. So I have cut down the number being being recirculated to 4 videos every day so it will be nearly 4 months before the old ones come back.

When I started the site the aim was to have one big site so we could compare, not compete, with sites like Sapphic and FTV. I could of gone for 4 or 5 medium size sites rather than one big one and sold members from site to site. I chose one big site with lots of updates every day. As most members only stay 3 months the majority don't see the scenes rotating. Yes for those who have been on the site for over 3 months it sucks and we do have a tool that can flag the scene as seen.

Today I'm putting up more of the content I shot back in the UK, some of it is porn stars, some real amateurs and some girls who did a bit of work. The contrast to todays work is amazing. It's all brand new, girls you will never see anywhere else EVER and it's different, in that is was shot in 1988 to 1998. Compare it with todays and please give me feed back.

It's not instead of, it's an extra. Could of made it for another site I decided to add it to the existing site.

I love feed back. I will change if I think it's right and I will say why I did it the way we do. You can tell me I'm wrong.

02-11-08  01:51am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.