Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Twistys

Twistys (4)

messmer (137) 04-14-08  12:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Large selection of attractive models.
+Large selection of videos and picture sets.
+Extremely fast download speed.
+Excellent search engine.
+True to its niche as glamor site.
Cons: The pictures, the pictures, the pictures. They all remind me of the false glamor of Playboy and Penthouse .. limbs that seem to be powdered with orange make up, faces and bodies without blemish or pore, colors way too warm. Only a few sets show true more "coolish" body color. My personal peeve, as commented on in another spot: too few landscape type pics. The sets are numbing in their sameness: model standing up in dress, model standing up without dress, model standing up nude, a couple of isolated body parts (vagina, breasts, buttocks) added in "landscape" format, that's it. This reduced my score by at least 8 points.
Bottom Line: Sorry, but I had to get the cons off my chest. The site is excellent for the young (I only found one model over forty!!) and for those who like Playboy type glamor (and silicone breasts) when it comes to their models.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Goldfish (67) Playboy glam is a perfect way to sum up this site. It would have been the best site on the Internet in the mid-80's -- if they had an Internet back then.
04-14-08  02:49pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Goldfish :

No doubt in my mind, Goldfish!
04-14-08  03:53pm

Reply To Message


WeeWillyWinky (88) Thanks for the review, messmer.
04-14-08  03:55pm

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) Good review. The videos are well done and worth joining up, but the photos are as you say, not erotic at all.
04-14-08  05:05pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :

I personally thought the review was a bit short of facts, but thanks, Monahan. And I hope I did the site justice despite my disappointment with the pictures.
04-14-08  05:52pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #3 - WeeWillyWinky :

You're welcome, WWW! Just keep in mind my subjectivity when it comes to good pictures. Not everyone is on my wave length.
04-14-08  05:54pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.