Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 3D Love Dolls

3D Love Dolls (0)

Active
78
Toadsith (48) 04-06-08  03:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * 206 Image Sets
* Large images at 900x1250
* All images rendered using 3D Graphics
* 19 Pornographic Comics Books Included
* Newest Video Clips: WMV, 640x480 1900kbps
* Impressive texturing on skin, eyes, et cetera
* Realistic looking hair
* Daily Updates (Updates are dated)
* Good anime styling, lots of different clothing
* Join at $24.95 and then try to cancel for $14.95 offer
* Interesting fetish sets like Futanari and Pregnant models
Cons: * Only 10 – 30 images per photo set
* No Search Engine
* No Browsing Indexes
* No Image Zip Files
* Creepiness Factor can be quite high
* Average video length 1 minute
* Only 20 short clips
* Significant amount of Non-Nude sets
* Very little hardcore sex
* Slow Download Speeds (100 KB/s)
* Water Marks on both images and animations
Bottom Line: 3D Love Dolls provides lots of photos of perfect and bizarre 3D rendered naked or half-naked girls posing. While you do get animations, they are very few, very short and might as well not be there. The photos are pretty large and of course perfectly crisp, being rendered on a computer and all. If you like the photos of the models on the tour page, you will get access to a lot of that. Unfortunately, if you like a particular set, you don’t get much – 20 photos or so.

The limited sets are really the downfall of the site. It does many things well: Daily updates, new outfits for the models, new backgrounds. Many of the photos are just begging to be made as desktop backgrounds. They don’t do much hardcore sets and that is good thing because they don’t really work. It is like watching G.I. Joe figures humping – the right position but none of that human touch.

Another problem is the creepiness factor – these models look human in many respects, but they also are teetering on the edge of the Uncanny Valley – positions and features are so close, but just off. If you saw a real person that looked like this you’d be both fascinated and horrified. I think they miss the valley but only by a hair breadth.

I like that they experiment with fetishes, I like the basic product and the update rate. They need more images per set and some more browsing / downloading features. As it is, you just feel like something is missing… like their models' souls.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

JBDICK (20) Hi Toadsith

Thanks for your review. I will hold off until I see a better review and they have more content. Thanks for the pointer on the cancel. good plan.

These sites are dangerous...I ended up mesmerised and went off looking for more...I liked your review.

The Creepiness Factor can be quite high...hmmmm. I think that's the statement that nails it for me.

Mind you, if you could bring them to life, I'd want one for Xmas. Ding Dong

Is Uncanny Valley another website?

Do you know if this is beaten by a better equivalent or not

04-07-08  01:45pm

Reply To Message

2

Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #1 - JBDICK :

The Uncanny Valley is an interesting thought-experiment on facsimiles of humans and how humans respond to them. Some roboticists complain about it because it was conjecture, and while it may not be hugely accurate I find it to be a pretty good explanation as to why androids can be so disturbing. Wikipedia has a nice article about it here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_Valley

As for other similar sites, Crazy XXX 3D World is interesting - good 3D work and explores about every fetish known to man, especially if you check out their uncensored work. I dunno, all 3D porn suffers from the same - not quite right problem - I think Hentai is usually a better option - and there are plenty of good sites for that. Titanime is a good choice for that.

04-07-08  01:57pm

Reply To Message

3

pat362 (371) I've been curious about animated porn for a few years now, I still haven't made up my mind, if I want to join one of these sites. I noticed that there isn't a lot of animated stuff mostly just images. Is there any talking? I'm affraid I need actual sound for me to enjoy porn. Watching just pictures stopped doing something for me years ago. Many of the girls have that Lolicon look to them.
Is that typical of content?

04-07-08  06:28pm

Reply To Message

4

Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :

The animation is really rather poor and I would strongly dissuade anyone from joining if they don't really fancy photos. You do get sound, but it doesn't really sync up with action and the videos only last a minute or two at best.

As for the content - yes, Lolicon would be one of the fetishes I'd say they explore. They would adamantly deny this as they declare at the bottom of their tour pages in big bold letters: "We create all our digital models to be 18 years of age or older." I suppose they could claim a few of their digital models have hormone disorders and thus look like they are twelve. They also do a bit of prego models, futanari (girl-boys, or transsexuals if you like), bondage, a wee bit of twin on twin incest - all sorts of things in the name of good ol' fashion fun.

Long story short: All pictures. One of the best among its peers. A little on edge with some of the fetishes. Still not worth the money.

04-07-08  07:03pm

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #4 - Toadsith :

I'm eagerly awaiting the day that you can have really life like animation similar to last years Beowulf in porn movies. I'd love to see how governments could justify going after studios or producers claiming mental or physical abuse of the performers or requiring that performers be identified as being 18+. Maybe I'm in a minority but I've never had much of an issue with make belief young girl themes in porn. I have some serious issues with underqage girls appearing in porn, but not the pretend aspect of a major.
04-08-08  06:16pm

Reply To Message

6

Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :

I have to agree that I don't see a moral problem with Lolicon, nobody is getting hurt and time and time again it has been shown that porn doesn't instigate acting out of the fantasies it portrays - just like video games don't make mass murderers of us all. Is there a good reason to have some legal control over sexual relations with living young people? Yes. I'm not entirely sure that the over 18 rule is perfect (14 used to be ripe marrying age for girls), but it certainly can be harmful to extremely young children to be over sexualized. Humans are sexual by nature, but the speed at which a human sexually matures seems to be adjustable via many factors - and a psychological factor is definitely one of them.
04-08-08  06:29pm

Reply To Message

7

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #6 - Toadsith :

I agree that watching lolicon, porn with a young girl/older person theme, or reading stories with similar themes will not transform a person into a pedophile. I'd rather someone with those tendencies get his jollies off by watching porn than going out and getting a young girl or boy and abusing them. In my opinion main stream media is far far more to blame for the oversexualization of our teens than porn can ever hope to achieve. Look at Jamie Lynn Spears. I saw a picture of 15 yrs old Miley Cirus wearing a one piece jumpsuit at the Nickelodeon award show. I felt uncomfortable watching that because you could see a cameltoe that would make a porn star jealous. This is suppose to be a role model for pre-teens and teens. I'd love to know exactly what message she was trying to send or where the fuck were her parents. Last I checked your have to be 18 to be considered an adult. Sorry for the rant.
04-09-08  05:20pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.