Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit CL Pass

CL Pass (0)

Active
78
JBDICK (20) 04-06-08  01:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Entrypoint to 4 sites, content from one studio so treat as 1 site. Click on thebestporn.com link, girls in the banner/logo are two prettiest girls on site. You might think they're not pretty. That wont matter. After 3 seconds girls faces are no longer inframe. If camera goes for wide shots you wont be looking at their faces. Girls do not need expressions, your eyes will be elsewhere.
Under Welcome message an exact description of what you get, read it, you'll know to decide to join.
Downloads are quick. Didn't use downloader but if you do you'll get the whole site in a few hours.
Girls are not slapped up with makeup like Porn Stars. They actually look innocent. The positions are incredible. I love the fact, take a Gymnast and make her wear PornStar Heels. So corrupt. Second biggest turn on for me.
First is the only thing seperating you from Heaven is a stretched piece of lycra with the gusset under strain and you can see every crease underneath. If only for HD-DVD.
Cons: Too Expensive, should be $19.99. For $39.99 you need HD, and buy some new leotoards for the girls. I think the leotards are shared.
Sasha's squint is annoying & sexy, a bit Rabbit caught in the headlights, but whose car?
Don't bother with archive site. Archive Photos struggle to fill a cell/mobile screen.
There are only a few Hi(ish)-Res videos, 100MB+. I seem to remember finding 3 over 150MB. Most 10-16Mb chunk files, approx 6-12 each set. Indicates most of content is old. Photosets not high-res. at most 1024px.
Repeating theme is boring. Like watching adverts on TV, Sitting there waiting for the main feature and eventually you realise there isn't one. Mind you it took me 8 days to work it out. I only went back once a week to pick up infrequent updates until my membership expired.
Loads of Girls but some mingers. Navigation basic but works.
Studio environment. You feel like its shot in someones house. Unfortunately it's not my neighbours otherwise I'd become a window cleaner.
Bottom Line: I couldn't work out was in most shoots they pose next to a camera tripod. Weird, what are they saying, Hey! we have two cameras?
If you like girls who suspend their bodies between two wooden chairs aka Golden Gate Bridge, you'll like this site. Where's the toll gate please.
How did that come about anyway, the chairs? Limited props? They look like old school chairs. creepy.
A few Girls look innocent. Having said that there are some shots where you can tell either the photographers jaw is on the floor, he's drooling or he's got a boner because the girl looks off camera and smiles. They know you're undressing them where the sun shines.
There is something very erotic about these girls. The problem is there's something missing. The poses are too posed, you feel like you're watching girls turn themselves into Rubik's Cubes...they never get to show us who they are. It is almost like they aren't there either.
I've got it. This is how women feel like when they go to the gynaecologists. It's like, please warm that up while I look over here because you look creepy drooling all over my 2nd hand leotard with your camera.
If you got these girls into a studio like inthecrack.com, gave them Estee Lauder makeup, not Avon, film them in HD DVD, I'd pay $39.99. (need to do nude though). Sad thing, none of them will get to the Olympics so this is it for them in Mother Russia / Eastern Block
Don't pay this much. Hate to say it. It's my money and I don't like being ripped off.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (10)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Toadsith (48) I don't know if it is actually the case, but Porn Users lists all these sites as Non-Nude porn. I've just never quite grasped the point of NN Porn - that is like trying to buy one of those cheesy softcore pornos from Blockbuster, save your cash. I was a member of CL Erotic a long while ago - but even half of that site was NN Porn, if I wanted to see attractive girls doing splits and what not, clothed, I can just go buy a ticket to a ballet and watch it live.

I know what you mean about the odd props and uncomfortable expressions on the girls, CL Erotic had the same problems. I feel like these are ballet drop-outs that decided it was a better gig than unemployment. Some of the girls were exquisitely beautiful, but the cringe factor could be pretty high.

04-06-08  01:58pm

Reply To Message

2

williamj (9) $39.95 is a bit expensive for average porn quality.
04-07-08  07:46am

Reply To Message

3

Boobs4ever (22) nice one there prewiev site looks really tempting but the prize turns me off. If they would go down to $19.99 I would probably not hestitate when it looks diffrent to what I normally see
04-07-08  09:31am

Reply To Message

4

JBDICK (20) REPLY TO #3 - Boobs4ever :

Hi Boobs4ever

Yep. I was vunerable, it was late, my wife was in bed and I fancied looking off the beaten track...

found it by chance and thought, I'll try that, but like you say in your reply, I got drawn in by the Previews. Some of the older photos are actually smaller than these newer ones...

What would be good is if Porn Sites could measure themselves against an induxtry standard like BSI - British Standards Institute...

Hey I think I might be onto an idea.

Anyway, thanks for the reply.

You're on my list to read your reviews. Need to make sure I'm up to scratch with my peers.

04-07-08  12:23pm

Reply To Message

5

JBDICK (20) REPLY TO #2 - williamj :

hi williamj

Hope the review was informative. I try and give a different type of review to most. more from my gut feel.

only a small point but this was below average quality for above average price...I think they had their calculators the wrong way round when they had that meeting...half the price is still a lot...don't be taken in by the 100,000 photos, they've probably included the thumbnails in that count.

Cheers

04-07-08  12:26pm

Reply To Message

6

JBDICK (20) REPLY TO #1 - Toadsith :

Toadsith

seems we have the same dry sense of wit.

attractive girls doing splits and what not, clothed, I can just go buy a ticket to a ballet and watch it live...

...you'd get arrested for being that close with your camera.

your comment...
ballet drop-outs that decided it was a better gig than unemployment. Some of the girls were exquisitely beautiful, but the cringe factor could be pretty high.

I can totally tune into that...it starting off being a curiousity trip for me at first but that soon wore off and I started feeling sad coz you can just tell the driver here is not the same as the girls from Prague or San Fernando Valley (who love it because they've been de-sensitised). these girls look lost...like you say, looking for a wage.

04-07-08  12:47pm

Reply To Message

7

Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #6 - JBDICK :

Haha - indeed I'd probably have to bring along my opera glasses to see the dancers as closely as the websites can provide.

On the other topic though - it is indeed saddening to actually converse with some of these impoverished girls, it was the main reasons I stopped dealing with pay-per-minute live cam sites. It was all very depressing. The girls really didn't have a lot of choices for income and they were rather uncomfortable with the whole deal.

On the other hand, I did like the cam service Met Art provided - there the girls did whatever they wanted and would simply chat with whomever they found the most interesting. Much happier environment - I'm guessing the girls got paid better as well.

04-07-08  01:10pm

Reply To Message

8

JBDICK (20) REPLY TO #7 - Toadsith :

Hi Toadsith

interesting about the cam stuff. Something I've never tried, but I know exactly what you are saying...

If I did it, I'd chose one the US ones because I know I'll feel better about it. I can see why the Met-Art would be okay though and the girls are Perfect...I guess they do get paid more, but they probably also have the respect of that business because it is so big, and I would imagine for them, there are times where the girls can chill out and chat together...

On these poor eastern sites, there's a sense of isolation, like lonely...very sad

Cheers

04-07-08  01:15pm

Reply To Message

9

badandy400 (103) That is too high of a price. A few months ago was there and I thought paying $30 was too much. Even the newer "HD" videos are no where near up to par. The photos are kind of a pain to download. Another case where Download Them All comes in handy.

Some of the scenes do have a sexual hint to them, but others are more like watching a gymnastics practice. That can be hot, but it could be a lot hotter!

04-07-08  08:46pm

Reply To Message

10

JBDICK (20) REPLY TO #9 - badandy400 :

Hi badandy400

Thanks for the reply.

I agree with you...this could be much hotter because a fair few of the girls were pretty.

I forgot about the pain with the photos...painful.

The best thing they do is the most dangerous thing...they potray themselves to be better than they are, and I was caught by the trap. Their preview page has their best girls on it in good size photos.

It's like one of those Hotels you see in the Holiday brochure then when you arrive and see your room (the one without the view) you think...I've been ripped off.

Cheers

04-08-08  03:52pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.