
Flashy Babes (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some swell looking girls you (probably) will not see anywhere else.
Ok amount of sets and videos.
Videos are the top here and good quality- generally.
Mostly canadian girls and most very sexy
If you like softcore solo-girls, you'll find something here that no other site have (it seems)
Easy navigating. |
| Cons: |
No zip for photos (Man, it's 2008 - get your act together)
Some models are very "shy" or whatever. But some models do not even show their tits.
This could be considered as an american/canadian version of Only Tease - but it's even more soft.
Could not get the "Live" part to work, maybe it's my own fault?
Expensive! |
| Bottom Line: |
Browsed this site several times - then forgot all about it, until I saw silvers review.
When browsing the site again some real fine looking teens/girls came up.
The preview is ok, but get you to a point where you think the content is better than it really is.
I first went for the videos - as usual.
The best resolution is 720x480 - not top. But most videos are ok in quality - and then again the earlier videos still seem a bit blurred - even for 720x480.
They should do better in video resolution to make some kind of hit in the softcore-area.
Too bad some of the better looking models are doing videos extremely soft. No nipples, some keep their bra on and MOST do not remove their panties.
But - as mentioned - this is somewhat an answer to the british Only Tease - and if that's ok with you, this site is a fine alternative.
Still, you have to be a sucker for soft, because it's still $ 29.95 - and that's way too expensive for what you get, if you're looking for porn - even softcore.
And this is foremost for video-freaks. The photo-sets are fewer and there's no zip!
The navigation is allright with a lot of choices in browsing.
Do not know about the interaction, did not try, did not care.
Still - the live thing they promised did'nt wotk at all for this user.
Some good soft videos - but will NOT be back. |
Reply To Review |