Overdeveloped Amateurs (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Yes, there are a lot of very large tits on this site |
| Cons: |
- With the exception of a few very small details, site design has never changed
- Severe lack of content
- Video quality is horrible - 320x240 mpg only
- Except for special features, everything is in 40-second clips
- Updates are almost random - every third or fourth day?
- Picture gallery is all dated material - from 2001 and 2002
- Content replaced every month |
| Bottom Line: |
Each month starts out with a dozen or so sets, a "set" being ten 40-second clips or their "special features" which are roughly a 10 minutes long. Then, every few days or so, either a new set of clips or another feature is added. It's almost random, and hard to get a fix on what the update frequency actually is. The only thing I know for sure is that the "features" are rotated out weekly. In the end, after my month was up, all I wound up with was 2.55 gigs of video that looks like it was shot with a VHS camera and that I had a lot of clip joining to do.
On their Q&A page (where for some reason they decided to use Java based popups that sometimes pop up 2, 3 and 4 times), I saw this:
Question: Why did you decide to make this a monthly issue?
Answer:
"I built this site to be the way i wish all websites were. fresh material all the time without looking at the same stuff each time i come back to the site. so i decided its better to give fresh material each month, then to just keep updating leaving lots of material that you've already seen."
That's not the feeling I get. I picture someone running a niche site who wants to minimize server usage and maximize profits. I can also easily imagine that whomever's running this site figures there are enough people who just decide they want to see some huge tits every once in a while, that they don't need to update the site design. It shows. (Bottom line continued in replies) |
Reply To Review |
