Misha Online (0)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||+Many beauties: Jamie Lynn, Lela Starr, Andie Valentino, Zdenka Podkapova, Jana Cova, Crystal Klein, etc.
+Much improved navigation since my last visit (Sept. ’06): pics and vids in separate dated archive sections; alpha model index; search feature by cup size, hair and eye colors, and ethnicity/nationality
+Improved pic sizes (usually) to 2000px from July ‘07 (with a few exceptions, which are repostings of earlier photosets)
+110 solo videos; 36 “lesbian” vids (but on pages “under construction”); see the con’s, too!
+Good price considering archive size – but only for the pics!
+Good server speed for vid and zipped gallery downloads
||-Signup: Requires that you retype your email address and pwd. Then the confirm page (with the link for canceling) shows for under 1 sec. before switching to your homepage. How convenient!
-Rate of updates: Only 121 pic sets in 2007; only 32 vids in 2007, and none since November
-“Hi quality” vids wmv or QT are 400x300, 1602kbps and look BAD
-Pics sometimes overly airbrushed or odd in color; some b&w’s, too
-Not all exclusive. A number of photosets also at Penthouse, such as Andie Valentino (5/4/07), Nicole Graves (2/18/08 and even has the Penthouse watermark); also at Danni: Jana Jordan (1/18/06), Karli Montana “Study Hall.”
-Watermark gets obstructive on smaller-sized pics
-Pic sizes before July ’07 range between 1200 and 2000 (inconsistent); are 1024px or 1280px between from May ’06 to end of ’06; most often are only 1024px before May ‘06
-Management: Photos "all" link ends at 2/20/08; "solo" link goes to 3/12/06. Inconsistent new window or not in opening galleries.
||This site’s been on online since Dec. 2003, yet it has been left unreviewed by both TBP and PornUsers for all this time!
First off, if you don’t like stylized softcore glam, solo or soft lez, forget it, ‘cause that’s what the site’s about.
Second, if you’re a vid fan, skip it! (They do have places on their vid pages to eventually add “Super Hi Quality” vids, but none are on as if yet, as far as I could tell.)
#3: The Penthouse sets have larger pics (usually up to 4000px) on the Penthouse site, so why go here for those? And if you like Danni’s site, the 2000px there are also 2000px here.
However, if you’re satisfied with pics at 1024px, there’s a nice volume of truly exclusive content here from the site inception, and most of the models are very fine indeed. What I question as a business decision, though, is the sacrifice of the brand identity of this site by making too much of the content, from 2006 on, available at Danni and Penthouse. Why not have pics up to 4000px here and keep it all exclusive? Just wondering.
The site has made great strides to improve the navigation, which, along with too-small pic sizes, kept me away for 1.5 years. It used to be very difficult to find updates past a certain point, and there were too many separate, small, unresizable windows. Glad that’s over!
I also see that they now use the same tricky cancellation form as DigitalDesire and Danni. I recommend CONFIRMING that cancellation is complete.
Reply To Review