Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Club Sandy

Club Sandy (0)

jake07621 (41) 03-09-08  11:26am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Sandy is very beautiful and has lots of sets.

The site has a good amount of kinky content, ie, peeing, etc.

The other ladies on the site are also very beautiful.

The site is mostly g/g but there is hardcore b/g material.

Large site, lots of content.
Cons: I find the site difficult to navigate, but that's not the worst part.

I've love to see more of Sandy in b/g scenarios, but that's not the worst part.

The video quality is good but it takes a long time to download an entire video, but that's not the worst part.

The worst part is that you never know if the site is going to work or what portions of it are working. I never know if I'll get in and when I get in I may or may not have an opportunity to view the content. It is so bad and so inconsistent that it is maddening and I rarely go on the site any longer.
Bottom Line: My score of 75 is generous. Beautiful women and a lot of content and previous high scores made me nice. But I wouldn't recommend this site until it becomes more stable and they fix that is a major difficulty right now.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


jd1961 (95) Good review. Site functionability is most important, although usually taken for granted. Premium price needs to equate to premium technical service. There is nothing worse than clicking with nothing happening.
03-09-08  03:46pm

Reply To Message


PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :

Yep - that's the main rub with this site

The other thing is that it is not state-of-the-art when it comes to size of pics or quality of vids. One-By-Day has left it in the dust in those important areas, not to mention frequency of updates.

I don't know - this site needs to do something pretty massive to challenge the quality of what DDF is doing these days, and if they can't even keep the site up and running.......

03-10-08  07:09pm

Reply To Message


nadiencendia (83) I was a member of this site for a long time and they never experienced any problems whatsoever. However, recently they've added a note that says that they are having performance issues, because they are being attacked by competitors. I don't know if this is true or if it's just bullshit trying to cover their technical problems, but it's just worth mentioning.
03-12-08  01:47am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) jake's right about "the worst part".
It's quite strange in more ways: Club Sandy is a part of 21Sextury.com Productions, but the site seems to be neglected from the webmasters at that Co. WHY?
Are they over their head in sites? - 50 in all. I've tried Club Sandy twice and got fed up with the slow working too - downloads (using DM) was ok, but browsing took forever and sometimes the username/password did not work.
And BTW: Their Porn Pass For All is a mess - first: it's not pass for all - if you want "all" the sites, your're lurked into several months of membership and when you join the first time your're in their mercy about what sites you can access...
Another BTW: Take a look at former comments for their prime site: Pix and Video. (Same problem)

03-12-08  04:31pm

Reply To Message


damon21 (14)
(part 1 of 2)

Dear Jake07621,

We are sorry that you having bad experiences with our website lately.
I try to explain what is going on at ClubSandy and our other sites.

Our servers have again been under DDoS attacks for weeks now. (Most likely caused by our competitors.)

For those who don't know much about DDoS attacks I've copied a part of the Wikipedia DDoS article here:
"Distributed attack - A distributed denial of service attack (DDoS) occurs when multiple compromised systems flood the bandwidth or resources of a targeted system, usually one or more web servers. These systems are compromised by attackers using a variety of methods. [...]

A system may also be compromised with a trojan, allowing the attacker to download a zombie agent (or the trojan may contain one). Attackers can also break into systems using automated tools that exploit flaws in programs that listen for connections from remote hosts. This scenario primarily concerns systems acting as servers on the web. [...]

These collections of compromised systems are known as botnets. DDoS tools like stacheldraht still use classic DoS attack methods centered around IP spoofing and amplification like smurf attacks and fraggle attacks (these are also known as bandwidth consumption attacks). SYN floods (also known as resource starvation attacks) may also be used. Newer tools can use DNS servers for DoS purposes. [...]

More sophisticated attackers use DDoS tools for the purposes of extortion even against their business rivals.

It is important to note the difference between a DDoS and DoS attack [...] if an attacker uses a thousand zombie systems to simultaneously launch smurf attacks against a remote host, this would be classified as a DDoS attack.

The major advantages to an attacker of using a distributed denial-of-service attack are that multiple machines can generate more attack traffic than one machine, multiple attack machines are harder to turn off than one attack machine, and that the behavior of each attack machine can be stealthier, making it harder to track down and shut down. These attacker advantages cause challenges for defense mechanisms [...]"

(full article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ddos#Distributed_attack)

We are working together with a traffic filtering partner (Prolexic) who is a market leader in the field of defending websites on the Internet. They have different techniques to separate 'bad' and 'good' incoming traffic. However there is no solution which meets all requirements - to filter all bad guys and to let all real visitors in.

03-17-08  03:28am

Reply To Message


damon21 (14)
(part 2 of 2)

Our partner filters our incoming traffic but when filtering 'bad' traffic some 'good' traffic is also filtered out, because it is really hard to decide which server request is for viewing the website content and which one is for overloading our servers (in other words: attacking us).
The worst thing is that attackers are simulating normal visitors' behavior very well.

The result of this filtering is what you see as unavailable or slow websites, problems with downloads, etc. However there are some lucky places on the planet where all seem to be almost ok.

We are about to invest more in defense solutions in order to have this situation resolved as soon as possible to be able giving the service we are here for. But we need some time to proceed with all this technical stuff and new partners.

I hope this post will clear up some things about the recent problems with our websites.

If you experience any malfunctions on our websites, please
- contact our customer support at support [@] 21sextury.com
- in the case you can't even reach our websites, please send us your IP so we can have our filtering partner to put it onto their whitelist
- if you'd like to get a refund, please let us know and we'll give you a refund
- when we'll back to full normal operation as a compensation we'll give away free access for active members to additional websites in our portfolio

We appreciate your understanding and we're sorry for the inconveniences these attacks are causing.

All the bests,
Damon Baker

03-17-08  03:29am

Reply To Message


Davit (46) Appreciate the review, regarding functionality. I never had any probs at all, but that was several months ago. I happily rated the site 95 for the lesbian content alone - it's some of the best I've seen absolutely anywhere.
But this is irrelevant if we can't access the site without extreme difficulty.
What a shame some bastards out there are attacking the site - as the webmaster says, it's probably coming from competitors that see this fine site as a threat.
I'll be keeping an eye out for any updates from the webmaster regarding a resolution, as I've been away now for over 7 months, and feel I'm due a re-visit.

With all the problems in mind, I still feel 75 is rather low for such an otherwise top class site. But then again, I'm not a fan of boy-girl (not really into naked men, being hetro) so am happy with the majority of lesbian and solo girl sets here. ;)

04-10-08  07:06pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.